Ok j'ai lu l'en-tête du blog mais ça répond pas a mon interrogation profonde : si le mec parsème ses textes de jugements à l'emporte-pièce, comment lui faire confiance pour correctement représenter son sujet ? On peut penser que son raisonnement est de qualité similaire sur le reste.
falcunculus
notre époque actuelle, véritable désastre intellectuel (merci les « smartphones », les « influenceurs » et la vaste crétinisation de millions d’êtres humains surtout adolescents)
Comment prendre au serieux un tel texte ? Le reste de l'article est intéressant, mais difficile de lui donner du crédit après ce genre d'introduction.
I don’t have any statistic, but I would guess that the proportion of people wanting a Jack is significantly higher in the group of people interested in buying Fairphone that on the general population.
Fairphone literally does have that statistic. They spent effort to gather that info in order to inform their business decisions. And they report:
We also looked into the consumer data and Fairphone 4’s weight and thickness were more of an issue than the lack of a minijack
I don't understand this, why not call him the way he wants to be called ? He's despicable but his name isn't the problem, I don't see how calling him Bowman (or calling Donald "Drumpf") is making any progress.
And it kind of undermines the discourse that we should respect people's choice as to how they define themselves.
The St-Basil cathedral and Kremlin in the background make the context obvious, they're not trying to pass it off as a serious photograph.
When France turned into a republic it had been a monarchy for more than a millenium, yet it did happen. Historical precedent can only tell you so much.
What you're saying plays right into Russian state propaganda that says their culture requires a strong leader and dedication to a common propose as opposed to Western individualism. In truth, Russian liberalization is possible, but it will be much harder if the west does not extend their hand.
Do you remember the time Marco Rubio repeated the same thing twice during a presidential debate ? His speech included calling the US "the greatest nation in the history of the world" but no one minded that.
In most countries you would be ridiculed for saying something like that, but from what I understand Americans are taught that their country is the best in basically everything and they are very lucky to be born there because every other place is worse off.
The American military doesn't train to put on parade theatre for a despot. No high stepping, no elaborate formations or movements. None of that pointless bullshi
Marines doing the silent drill in dress uniform : 👀
I'm unsure I get your point, how does waste prevent a shortage from becoming a famine ?
Also, both raw cauliflower and tinned tomatoes can be eaten almost as is.
It's not just whales, one could draw the same comic about other animals being hunted or factory farmed, it would be very traumatic to live through. In fact Disney made an animated one about deer.
In political discourse anarchy has been given another meaning which is the elimination of undue power and self-governmen. Left anarchism focuses on eliminating hierarchies (power not justified by ability or need), while right anarchism focuses on eliminating special legal privileges such as those of the state.
Je pense que c'est bien qu'il se rende plus visible. Chez moi les gens de Debout! parlent vraiment à un autre public et abordent d'autres questions que les autres partis de gauche. La méfiance est compréhensible en raison de certaines déclarations et de la forte personnalisation de son mouvement, mais il y a vraiment quelque chose que les autres ne font pas et dont la gauche aura besoin pour gagner.