fidodo
You could still be very annoying and maybe scare them
I'll give them one thing which is that they're very creatively stupid
They think the sun works like a spot light. I'm not kidding. It's the dumbest shit
In their own gif they need to make the light the sun puts out oblong which makes no fucking sense and there's no explanation as to why you can't always see the moon.
It's so stupid it's embarrassing to even debunk them.
Great way to lose all the best people at your company in a totally uncontrolled manner.
Another thing to consider is that developers consciously make design choices to adapt to the hardware available at the time, and these are not things you can just turn on and off with settings. For example maybe there's a zone transition that slows the game down on older hardware and in the past they would have added a subtle loading area like a tunnel but that's not needed anymore for their current target hardware. Should they completely change the game to be a bit smoother on 5+ year old hardware? You can get a ton of compatibility with changing settings, but to get the same level of optimization as games made at the time the old hardware was the target hardware would oftentimes mean significantly changing the game itself.
I'm a little confused by your timeline. I agree, 5 year old hardware should definitely support 1080p60, but the 1070 is 7 years old now. Since the 1070 could support that when it came out and those are static targets I think we should expect the 1070 to support 1080p60 forever for games similar to games that were coming out at the time, but it's a bit unfair to compare starfield to portal 2 and cs:go when those games are in constrained and controlled environments while starfield is vast and open, and environments definitely take a GPU toll, so you will lose some performance to that compared to those games. I haven't played starfield yet so I don't know the details, but given the scope I know of it, it doesn't sound unreasonable for it to miss the 1080p60 mark a bit given the difference in game environment.
And he's blaming the anti defamation league...
Shouldn't that already be covered under revenge porn laws? At least the distribution side of it.
Have you people never heard of a phone book? Phone numbers aren't sensitive information. If they want to scrape your phone number they can legally and trivially do so through public data sources. Google does plenty of sketchy things around privacy, but this isn't one of them, it's just about security.
Did you do it anonymously or did you have your name on it? According to their form
They should be required to process it, but only if it's not anonymous. I'm guessing anything anonymous is thrown in the bin unless it's super serious.