Ha, can't blame my version, more likely my faulty memory!
Yeah, the leadership have a pretty tight grip on who gets to run. If they suspect Burnham's coming back to Westminster in order to take down the leadership, they can just block him from the candidacy. That comes with its own risks, but it's obviously the best way to protect the leadership, so that's what they'll do!
Also he’s relatively unknown outside of Manchester. So he’d have to have a big PR drive.
Within the party, he's very well-known, and running for PM is its own PR drive! But yeah, you are correct that the obstacles are considerable.
I think it's safe to say he wasn't like, 'I would marry her because I respect her like Ed Miliband respects a van'.
“Oh, what’s the point of keeping billionaires out of social media?”
I don't understand who or what attitude this is supposed to be paraphrasing.
I’ve long thought twitter, by its nature, was corrosive to civil society, but unfortunately that won’t be fixed by replacing it with another short-form rage-machine.
I called them the 'looney left' in the exact same way that I called them the 'real/actual' left. Since it would make no sense for me, a left wing person, to describe some other group of people as the real left, that's a clue that I wasn't being serious, as was the overall tone of the sentence. In fact, you've been far ruder about the party's left (however defined) than I have, in that the implication of what you're saying must necessarily be that they're all fools and dupes for having dedicated their lives to the party!
You're under no compulsion to find me amusing, of course, but if you don't like the way I post on here, I suggest not replying at all rather than bothering me with rude and patronising misinterpretations of my comments.
I think the rudeness and the wrongness may be inextricable. Either way, I'm not interested in discussing anything with people who can't manage to be civil about it.
Don't patronise me.
Oh, well. Do let us know when you conclude something.
Yeah, I'm wary of anything Lansman thinks is a good idea. Yet, as John McTernan argued, Momentum did have some genuine intellectual vibrancy - at least at the start. Question is whether its decay into typical boring shouty lefty group was inevitable or not.
Much as I think that the rest of the Labour MPs and staff acted like malicious fools while Corbyn was leader, I think even his biggest fans would now have to agree that he may have been part of the problem.