freamon

joined 4 months ago
[–] freamon@preferred.social 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

That modlog entry is actually for the LW community - it's a bit clearer here: https://lemmy.world/modlog/31408?page=1&actionType=All&userId=13663964

[–] freamon@preferred.social 0 points 2 months ago (6 children)

The posts being made to the LW community aren't being made by someone who cares about this comic. They're not genuinely providing anything, they just have a stupid tedious beef with lemmy.ml, and so mindlessly crosspost everything they see posted to an ML community to a non-ML community. This means that if you don't post first, the comic is unlikely to appear at all.

[–] freamon@preferred.social 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Ah, shit. Cheers. The amount of things learned from the comments under memes is probably a bit high, but I'll send a commit to fix this in a minute.

Does Lemmy look at the mods URL again when it decides to refresh a community (or when it receives an Update / Group) ? If not, then PieFed instances might need to send out some "Add" activities.

[–] freamon@preferred.social 18 points 2 months ago (6 children)

PieFed isn't hiding mods - when Lemmy fails to get them, it's for its own mysterious reasons.

In ActivityPub, to get the moderators of this community you can do this from the command-line:
curl --header 'accept: application/activity+json' --location https://feddit.uk/c/fedimemes/moderators | jq .orderedItems

To get the moderators of a PieFed community, it's exactly the same:
curl --header 'accept: application/activity+json' --location https://piefed.social/c/50501/moderators | jq .orderedItems

In both cases, the mods URL comes from the attributedTo field for the community.

[–] freamon@preferred.social 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

What is the update delay for Fediseer?

I don't know. It's not something I'm familiar with - it might just default to saying 'closed' if it doesn't have the data.

It's interesting that the obvious bot accounts on those instances were set up in mid-March last year, so I'm guessing that these are somebody's army that they've used before, but overplayed their hand when they turned it on the DonaldJMusk person. The admins can reasonably be blamed for setting up instances with open registrations and no protections and then forgetting about them, but I'd be wary of blaming them for being behind the attack directly. The 'nicole' person is unlikely to have used their own instance - it's probably just someone with the same MO as whoever owns the bots, finding and exploiting vulnerable instances.

[–] freamon@preferred.social 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

lemmy.world recently updated from version 0.19.3 to 0.19.10. This change - for Lemmy communities to federate out posts with the community name as a hashtag - was introduced in 0.19.4, so that might be the other reason why this has only just become an issue for you.

[–] freamon@preferred.social 27 points 3 months ago (5 children)

The attacker seems to be the admin of those two instances. Both instances have their registrations closed.

The alternative theory would be that these instances had open registrations, but rightly closed registration down after the admins noticed the bots. chinese.lol is on 0.18.4 with an admin with a 2 year old account, lemmy.doesnotexist.club has an admin with a 1 year account, and it was also that instance that the 'nicole' person has used before. This downvote attack would need to be a long time in the planning for what you're suggesting to be true.

[–] freamon@preferred.social 4 points 3 months ago

There's an open issue for that kind of thing here: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/818

[–] freamon@preferred.social 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They've said similar things before - it's not like this show invented this problem. Whatever their half-arsed initiatives were before (typically things like sending a middle-aged woman to say "hey guys, don't be mean to girls, mmkay?") didn't work, because a real solution involves acknowledging the wider role that society plays, and spending real money in places that aren't London.

So instead they'll just blame boys - recognise that a teenage boy with low self-esteem is a dangerous thing, and give them one more thing to feel bad about. Tell them they should be different once, and ignore all the ways in which adults continue to encourage or discourage the ways they currently are.

And instead of raising places in the North out of deprivation, they're doing the cheapest thing imaginable. Streaming a show to school kids that explicitly calls out how much modern teaching has been reduced to playing videos for them. Genius.

[–] freamon@preferred.social 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you don't already know, loads of the images attached to your posts were deleted by accident: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/5560

There's a user who cross-posts lots of stuff from ML, and when the admin banned him, it nuked your images too (because both your posts and his posts were pointing to the same image).

[–] freamon@preferred.social 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's probably best to keep the first +1 for your own post or comment, as that's what's expected from people's experience on other platforms, and that's how it will appear on platforms that the content has federated to. Whether a user's reputation score should give them an additional and visible +1 is debateable, but PieFed might be stuck with that decision now.

[–] freamon@preferred.social 4 points 3 months ago

It's usually best to given 'em the benefit of the doubt, as a bad performance by a child actor is often more due to the director than the kid.

view more: ‹ prev next ›