No. I don't share his concern, but he is entitled to have it.
I personally have greater ownership over my digital copies than physical ones because they can be easily backed up and spread to different machines.
So close.
You should be pirating even if you can afford it because pirating is a tool to help reduce the disparity in wealth.
Yeah. If piracy wasn't an option, I just wouldn't play those games.
So many games I have pirated that I have yet to play because there aren't enough hours in the day and I don't want to spend them all gaming.
All the money you give these corporations will be used against you someday.
In a way, this is what I wanted back in the 90s when so few people understood the potential of video games as a serious art form.
Same, but definitely not for competitive multiplayer games. That's the antithesis of the direction gaming should go in.
Instead, we should've moved more towards co-op. Gamers would be happier and healthier, which is why it was decided they should not appreciate it.
I genuinely feel bad for all the people getting suckered into wasting hundreds of hours in a game like fortshit just because it's free and their loser friends got suckered into playing it, too. They have no idea what's happening around them. If they ever realize it, it will likely be too late.
Those really were the days.
Before analysts had as much data to take advantage of people's low standards.
The fuck is with these shitty pcgamer articles?
Good luck.
I thought it was pretty overrated and kinda boring.
Downvoted for shitty headline
Yeah, why avoid buying a product that doesn't meet our standards if it won't change the company.
I've never heard of it, but it definitely seems like one of those games.
Obsidian has to pay streamers more to shill it for longer in order to compete.
You're right, it's Platinum.
I get the two confused because of some darling sentiment the gaming community had towards them.