[-] jake_eric@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Yeah, happening to me too. I think some of the comments are showing in reverse order, too, like the child before the parent.

[-] jake_eric@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Sure, but having fewer accounts is easier: that's the whole purpose of federation in the first place, isn't it?

It's fine now, but I haven't been on Lemmy for that long, and I don't want to have to make a new account every few months to see a new instance.

[-] jake_eric@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Sure, I'm aware of idiots on the internet, but if we tried to avoid idiots on the site we wouldn't federate with anyone. Lemmy.world is specifically billed as a "generic Lemmy server for everyone to use," I want the gates to be open fairly wide, that's why I'm here. Not for everyone, like I'm glad we defederated with exploding heads, but we still gave them a shot first and there was at least some more community discussion on it before that decision was made. That's what would make me feel a lot better about this.

[-] jake_eric@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I'm not really seeing it to be honest. That first bullet point there seems pretty clearly saying to their users to not be a problem so that they don't get defederated.

I'm sure you can find someone calling to brigade such and such on there somewhere but they have over 20 thousand users total. That's a lot of people to rule out.

[-] jake_eric@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Well yeah, I already said I know that's the go-to if you don't like one instance. But I'd still like to be able to express my opinions before doing that. It's not that big a deal but I'd still ideally rather not, y'know?

[-] jake_eric@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

That first bullet is saying "don't do stuff that's going to get us defederated" to their users, no? It's a bit tongue in cheek but I feel like it's not as aggressive as some people are describing. The whole server came from a subreddit that was very memey/shitpost.

[-] jake_eric@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Well the server is described up at the top as a "generic Lemmy server for everyone to use," which feels like it's setting up to be a pretty neutral stance.

[-] jake_eric@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

The thing is that kind of example assumes that it is cancer. Which is something I'm not happy assuming yet, especially without discussion.

Hexbear has over 20k users. I find it hard to believe they're all Russian trolls, or even that most of them are.

[-] jake_eric@lemmy.world 119 points 1 year ago

I'm gonna come out and say, even with the statement, I'm not in favor of preemptive defederation like this.

I know the admins of an instance are hosting us basically out of the goodness of their own hearts, and I appreciate that. And I understand they can do whatever they want, and we can move to a different instance if we want. I get it.

But I joined .world because I wanted a neutral instance that would connect with pretty much everyone unless they were particularly problematic. Could hexbear be particularly problematic? Sure, maybe. But I think there's a big difference between defederating in response to a problem and defederating in anticipation of a potential problem, especially since the users aren't given a chance to discuss it. Like, I know we're not technically entitled to give our input if we're not admins, but I think it would be nice, y'know?

If it was just some small instance of trolls that's one thing, but hexbear is actually quite a big instance, so this is a very impactful decision. I don't like it being made preemptively behind the scenes like this.

193
8
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by jake_eric@lemmy.world to c/dndnext@ttrpg.network

I couldn't find a dedicated c/unearthedarcana so I'm posting here. I've been creating a handful of homebrew spells to fit characters I'm playing. For this one I wanted to make a spell for my lighting storm-themed gish character that would also be a nice capstone spell for an Eldritch Knight in general. While there are some similar-ish spells I'm basing it off of, I wanted some feedback if it's balanced based on the damage numbers and amount of benefits for its spell level.

Personal Lightning
4th-level evocation
Casting Time: 1 bonus action
Range: Self
Components: V, S
Duration: Concentration, up to 10 minutes

You channel the energy of a fierce lightning storm within your body. You gain the following benefits until the spell ends:

  • Attacks you make deal an extra 1d6 lightning damage on a hit.
  • Your speed increases by 20 feet.
  • Your movement doesn't provoke opportunity attacks.
  • Your jump distance is tripled.

As an action on your turn, you can dismiss this spell and cause a blast of electricity to erupt from you. Each creature within 20 feet of you must make a Constitution saving throw. A creature takes 3d6 lighting damage and 2d6 thunder damage on a failed save, or half as much damage on a successful one.

At Higher Levels: When you cast this spell using a spell slot of 5th level or higher, the thunder damage dealt by the blast increases by 1d6 for each slot level above 5th. Using a spell slot of 6th level or higher also causes you to gain a fly speed of 50 feet until the spell ends.


Edit based on feedback: I'm getting a variety of responses, so I'm figuring out what exactly needs to be targeted for adjustment here. The blast option seems to be considered a bit strong since it's an additional mode to the other benefits. I can shrink the range and drop the damage a little. I don't want to nerf it too much though because it's still costing an action. Maybe drop it down to 15 foot radius and, what, 3 or 4 damage dice?

In terms of the main mode of the spell, I want the spell to compare fairly overall with guardian of nature which is the same level. Guardian has two different modes that both give advantage on (pretty much) all of your attacks; with that in mind I'm considering if it's fair to up the damage dice from my spell to 1d8 per hit. Would that be fair, or am I underrating the other benefits of my spell here?

[-] jake_eric@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I liked it overall but thought the ending was fairly meh; it didn't feel satisfying to me. Though I've been disappointed with almost all the finales of the Disney+ Marvel shows, even of the shows I mostly liked overall. It wasn't really about too much exposition, just that I didn't feel like it really wrapped up the season properly. I'm getting a bit tired of every show ending in a way that teases what comes next instead of just giving that story a proper conclusion.

Really what I was hoping for was for Loki to pull off some kind of satisfying plan after feeling pretty out of his depth the whole season. I get that's sort of the theme of the show, that the TVA and Kang situations are above even Thanos and Asgardians, but he's still a thousand-year-old trickster god whose whole thing is schemes. There were a few times I expected him to have something more going on, but the payoff never really happened. But I digress a bit. I'm still looking forward to season 2; Tom Hiddleston is fun to watch.

[-] jake_eric@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But the system also makes it so that when people act purely selfishly for money, that it results in good outcomes for everyone.

Why do you think this??

Look at all the constant environmental disasters and harmful products that happen because corporations did the math and determined that paying a few million to lawsuits every once in a while is cheaper than being more careful. "Voting with your wallet" does not work because the big corporations undercut the competition and bombard us with advertising to ensure they will win no matter what.

Hell, most of us are on here because Reddit started doing scummy things in the name of money, and we're a tiny fraction of their userbase; Reddit is still unfortunately doing pretty much fine. Is that the best outcome for everyone?

And don't forget that there are a lot of regulations passed in the last hundred years that were necessary because corporations were doing stuff like dumping so many chemicals into our waterways that rivers would constantly catch fire. This is what happens with unfettered capitalism.

1

Not an image post but the precon spoilers are a few days out still and Gavin dropped some hints on R*ddit about the new cards in the decks. Hopefully this kind of post is allowed :D. I'm copying them here because I know you don't want to have to watch the video:

Hint #1: There is a card that is NOT a planeswalker, which enters with loyalty counters

Hint #2: There is a new card with the adamant ability, originally seen in Throne of Eldraine.

Hint #3: There is a card that can become a legendary 6/6 Nightmare God creature with menace and deathtouch.

Hint #4: The colorless deck isn't just eldrazi – for example, there’s a new colorless Ikoria monster, and a new Strixhaven Archaic too!

Hint #5: There's a card I love that was originally designed for Commander 2018 and cut

Hint #6: There's a new titan, modeled after the M11 titans

Hint #7: There's a card that turns planeswalkers into birds

Hint #8: There's a new impetus, in the vein of the onces we originally saw in Ikoria Commander

Hint #9: There's a legendary card for an obscure flavor text character from Time Spiral block

Hint #10: There is a card named "Guff Rewrites History"

Hint #11: There's a legendary creature that makes you choose a planeswalker type.

Hint #12: There is a mono blue planeswalker that has never gotten a card before - and no, it's not one of the Nine Titans!

1
1

[[Sakiko, Mother of Summer]]

1
1
1
1

[[Talrand, Sky Summoner]]

1
1
1
[-] jake_eric@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Yup I can even post comments first try, without getting an error! Things are working well!

view more: next ›

jake_eric

joined 1 year ago