janonymous

joined 2 years ago
[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That is technically biometric data

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I've come to the conclusion that you need to actually put something playable in front of a bunch of people who don't know you, to properly gauge how compelling your game is. Ideally a vertical slice where with the necessary polish to convey the feel of the end product.

Let them play and watch. Listen to their feedback, but don't put too much weight on it. Players usually can't account for the limits of a prototype, even if it is a vertical slice. Also they usually can't quite pinpoint what made them like or dislike something, but they will want to give you feedback. Just note what they say and try to figure out later what the underlying issues might have been. More importantly, you need to watch them play. Ideally you want a setup where there are a bunch of games, like at a gamedev gathering, or at least something else to do, where people can freely decide to play your game or not and don't feel forced to do so. Seeing how they interact with the game on their own terms, seeing how long they play, whether they get their friends to play it as well, is the true litmus test.

To have a successful indie game, I believe, it needs to capture people on its own, just by it's presentation and gameplay. And it needs to deliver such a memorable experience that people will recommend it to their friends and talk to each other about it.

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I get the feeling a lot of [reddit] gamedev communities are full of people who haven’t built anything

FTFY

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I guess the sharing could be a problem

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

You don't have to check all to be considered addicted, though.

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

That really made my Sunday morning, thanks!

I cross posted it to bmoviebonanza@lemmy.world where I'm sure it will be appreciated as well!

 

https://atomicpoet.org/media/dd7a251235ad9f318e0a10da7270a8ee1279240ce57318c355e6b919f773087e.png

Kraa The Sea Monster (1998) is what happens when Godzilla’s sleazy cousin crawls from a Jersey swamp in a rubber suit that reeks like a stale Domino’s pizza box.

This was Full Moon’s grand attempt to ride the coattails of Godzilla ’98, and they don’t even try to hide it. There’s literally a Godzilla billboard in one of the destruction shots, like the movie itself is sighing, “Yeah, you probably should’ve watched that other garbage instead of this garbage.”

The setup is threadbare: Lord Doom—Doctor Doom’s knockoff brother from a Halloween clearance bin—sends Kraa to stomp Earth into submission. Planet Patrol, a team of photogenic twenty-somethings squeezed into lycra on what looks like a rejected Death Star set, can’t make it to the fight. S

o the job falls to a biker, a waitress, and, best of all, a clam-shaped alien puppet who talks like he’s auditioning for Super Mario Bros. Supposed to land in Italy, he crashes in New Jersey instead, so of course he speaks in a cartoon Italian accent.

And the monster? Kraa ambles through miniatures like he’s shopping for groceries. Sometimes you’ll catch timecode still burned into the frame, or a green screen that never got finished. The rubber suit itself was later sold off to collectors—proof that someone out there paid actual money to own a piece of Full Moon’s sweat-soaked kaiju history.

Planet Patrol could’ve been the saving grace. They’re pretty, they’re in lycra, and they radiate late-night-TV charisma. But they barely show up, leaving us stuck with Earthlings nobody cares about. Worse still, when the monster footage arrives, it’s so bland you almost miss the biker and waitress. Almost.

Here’s the problem: Kraa! isn’t gloriously inept like Plan 9 from Outer Space, and it isn’t stylishly wild like Starcrash. It’s self-aware bad. It winks at you. And nothing kills camp faster than a movie begging to be in on the joke. It’s the cinematic equivalent of the kid in high school rehearsing comebacks in the mirror, never realizing that trying too hard is the least cool move of all.

In the end, Kraa! The Sea Monster is a kaiju flick without menace, a parody without guts, and a spoof without bite. Watch it if you’re curious, but don’t expect “so bad it’s good.” This one’s “so bad it’s boring”—and boring is the monster no one can beat.

Found on movies@piefed.social

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 42 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Game developers hate players. They keep breaking our beautiful games and optimizing the fun out of them!

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ooof, Lemmy really hates clickbait titles, huh? Changed it to the DeArrow title in the hopes that more people give it a chance this way. I usually just take the current video title, but I guess that just doesn't work here.

Edit: Oh I see it's even in the rules. My bad!

 

The Prisoner’s Dilemma and its real life applications

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Feels more like 90s than 80s for me. Reminds me of the "Hercules: The Legendary Journeys" series.

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago
[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Digital Services Act! Ich hab mich gerade gefragt was Das Schwarze Auge hiermit zu tun hat

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

Cannabis ist halt ein Thema mit dem man gerade gut Stimmung in der eigenen Basis machen kann. Und man kann danach zeigen "das man was gemacht hat" ohne wirklich viel machen zu müssen.

Denke Lachgas ist dafür noch zu unbekannt und aufwendig anzugehen.

 

I almost didn't watch Spellbound on Netflix, because it got such bad ratings on imdb (5.5) and Rotten Tomatoes (48%, 47%). But I did and I have to say: It's actually pretty good! It's very funny and imaginative and has something to say.

Sure, it's not perfect. It didn't have me on the edge of my seat the whole time and the songs didn't stay with me much after, but it honestly doesn't deserve these ratings! I mean it's a kids movie and it fully engaged the kid and had me and my girlfriend not only laughing out loud, but we all shed some tears in the final act end. It's a fine movie, definitely worth a watch with the family.

I'm really struggling to understand why it is rated so badly. I wouldn't say it is as good as K-Pop Demon Hunters (7.7 on imdb, 97% + 91% on Rotten Tomatoes) but I'd still give it a solid 7 or 80%. I mean we watched the feature-length episode 1 of Unicorn Academy and that was actually dreadful and still got 6.6 on imdb! I guess that's a bad comparison, though, because I expect it was just seen by way less people who rate movies.

Is it the embracing of non-traditional family structures that it caught the ire of the anti-woke folks? Is it just the unfavorably comparisons with simply way better similar movies by Pixar and Disney?

Has anyone seen it and can tell me their thoughts on it? I can't be the only one!

Edit: Going by the many 1 star ratings on imdb, the issue seems to be the message that sometimes divorce is okay 🙄

 

Found by day inside of a home in Germany. Not very skittish. Don't see the black stripes a German cockroach should have. It's the second one I've found inside, while I also found a few outside on the balcony (ground level), one drowned in the bird bath. I've also seen one inside a friend's room and on another ones balcony. Every time during the day. Looks very similar to the post HairyHarry@lemmy.world made last year.

Never seen them before in my life, but it doesn't seem to be the bad kind. Or am I wrong?

 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/42561795

A bunch of rich people and cops knew it would make kids more likely to do drugs and did it anyways

 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/42561795

A bunch of rich people and cops knew it would make kids more likely to do drugs and did it anyways

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/33139730

Fascinating look at the history of cheating in chess by Sarah Z

 

Fascinating look at the history of cheating in chess by Sarah Z

6
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by janonymous@lemmy.world to c/videoessays@lemmy.world
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/33044275

A fascinating deep-dive into the hellscape that is for-profit creative software

 

A fascinating deep-dive into the hellscape that is for-profit creative software

view more: next ›