[-] millie@startrek.website 3 points 4 months ago

I'm referring to your constant advertisement posts.

[-] millie@startrek.website 7 points 4 months ago

Goofy decision. I have an account here, but I rarely use it because of the ratio of spam to genuine posts on the instance.

You could always just defederate from those toxic instances? It seems like this isn't a popular decision with the community. Might be worth rethinking it.

[-] millie@startrek.website 5 points 7 months ago

Only because there's no box on the license application that says "donate body to be chummed and thrown on rich people".

But for real if my vacated body can save someone else's life or make it better by all means get that shit.

[-] millie@startrek.website 11 points 8 months ago

I hadn't even thought of this. Apparently it gave him terrible headaches too, because they screwed the damn visor into his head. Crazy. Poor guy.

[-] millie@startrek.website 65 points 8 months ago

I can't not think of Peanut Hamper.

[-] millie@startrek.website 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I mean, if it informs the performance meaningfully, it's part of the end product. Doesn't mean it's necessarily canon or whatever, but it certainly has the potential to impact later performances if direction moves away from the actor's previous internal preparation.

I could see it being off-putting to work under a director or with writing that bleeds your public personality into your role, especially if it's one you've gotten to a certain place with.

Like even as a roleplayer, any character i might embody in the moment has a life of its own that's distinct from mine, and would make decisions that I wouldn't. If someone tried to push me into acting a way that's more typical of myself out of character or that's more in line with a different character I play, or if they reacted to the character based on that outside stuff, I'd certainly resist it.

[-] millie@startrek.website 9 points 9 months ago

Clearly Rom is neutral good and Moogie is chaotic good.

[-] millie@startrek.website 8 points 10 months ago

That's always been my thought. There's so much internal monologue in Dune, how else are you going to represent it? The Scifi Channel and Villeneuve both seem to just kind of like, leave it out. Herbert's characters have rich internal lives, and arguably the most significant parts of Dune happen inside their heads.

The other adaptations maybe stayed closer to the source material for the details of the world in some aspects, but I think Lynch really nailed the feeling and some of the important ways of thinking that kind of get left out otherwise.

Thankfully, it seems like everybody's done a pretty good job with the source material so far. People grumble about the Scifi miniseries too, but it did a pretty great job conveying the first three books. I've been a life-long Dune fan and they all hit the mark for me. That's pretty rare in any adaptation, and I think it speaks to the strengths of the story itself and Herbert's fantastic world-building.

I can't even begin to try to like, rank my favorite Baron Harkonnen. They're all fantastic and take the character in pretty different directions.

[-] millie@startrek.website 4 points 10 months ago

This article was extremely confusing without the context of what this show is. I thought they were talking about some new Star Trek series with an alternate history.

[-] millie@startrek.website 8 points 11 months ago

That looks like a shut up kiss that didn't work on either of them.

[-] millie@startrek.website 5 points 11 months ago

This honestly went the other way around for me. There was a lot of stuff I couldn't manage as a teenager and in my 20s, and a lot of pain I had that I don't have anymore. Though I definitely have to do more negotiating with my body about food.

But I started taking estrogen in my early 30s, which seemed to make a big difference.

[-] millie@startrek.website 5 points 11 months ago

They're all transporter clones anyway.

view more: next ›

millie

joined 11 months ago