[-] neighbourbehaviour@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

They would love the NLRB to be unconstitutional wouldn't they...

46

Ruling on appeal of decision that found Bill 124 unconstitutional expected soon

[-] neighbourbehaviour@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Putting higher share of profits into workers' bank accounts strengthens aggregate demand. In other words more money for truck loans.

[-] neighbourbehaviour@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

It's very good. I haven't seen signs of breakage yet and it's permanently loaded with 2.5kg of weight. I was considering an Arkel but it wouldn't have worked as well for my purpose. I've got a convertible Arkel pannier though!

No kidding though, you look at a our made bags and outsource made ones, and there's a difference in price but not a huge one.

[-] neighbourbehaviour@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Not a Thudbuster but I used to have one before replacing it with this so I can provide even more info. ๐Ÿซ  It's a Kinekt. I liked the Thudbuster and wouldn't ride without it. My back pain disappeared. That said the Kinekt is better. Specifically because there's a preload adjustment. The Thudbuster is either bouncy during normal riding or stiffer than you need it due to the nature of its adjustability. You put a different elastomer, each covering a range of weights. It's fine and it works, but the Kinekt allows for precise adjustment via preload to eliminate bounciness during normal riding. I think the Suntour NCX might be even better and it's cheaper if you don't care about its weight.

I don't recall where I got them from anymore. I think I've had them for a decade now. ๐Ÿ˜‚

53
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by neighbourbehaviour@lemmy.world to c/bicycling@lemmy.world

Soma Double Cross w/ Ritchey fork, 1x11 Shimano drivertrain, 500W rear hub, 400Wh battery, torque pedal assist, 16kg

9
[-] neighbourbehaviour@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's an analogy. It's inaccurate as all analogies are. Yet it's useful to make the point that banning children from doing X or Y isn't unprecedented or unacceptable.

Kids go to school for much more than what they learn in class. A fully formed human being that can function in a society requires a lot of social interaction training. That's what school is for in-between classes. If kids are staring down their phones during that time instead of interacting with each other, that training is lost. Worse, instead of that, they get trained on a false social reality as portrayed by whatever enshittified platform they're currently on, based on whatever behavior makes the most money today. Is this enough to visualize the damage phones in hallways cause?

1

It was supposed to be a temporary setup but it's stayed like this for a while.

neighbourbehaviour

joined 1 year ago