[-] november@lemmy.vg 5 points 2 days ago

But transgenders and pronouns were never ever a thing in the Dragon Age franchise, and now they suddenly feature these so prominently.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krem_(Dragon_Age)

Every Dragon Age game has had pronouns because that's how fucking language works. Your brain has just been poisoned by right-wing outrage over "pronouns".

Also, "transgenders" isn't a word. "Transgender" is an adjective, not a noun, not that I expect that to mean anything to someone who freaks out about "pronouns".

[-] november@lemmy.vg 16 points 1 week ago

This sounds like a plausible thing that actually happened.

[-] november@lemmy.vg 19 points 1 month ago

I see what the problem is.

Here, this should be more agreeable to you:

The New York Times is full of shit (Opinion)

[-] november@lemmy.vg 44 points 1 month ago

Mark Richard Shuttleworth (born 18 September 1973) is a South African and British entrepreneur who is the founder and CEO of Canonical, the company behind the development of the Linux-based Ubuntu operating system.[1] In 2002, Shuttleworth became the first South African to travel to space, doing so as a space tourist.[2][3][4] He lives on the Isle of Man and holds dual citizenship from South Africa and the United Kingdom.[5][6] According to the Sunday Times Rich List in 2020, Shuttleworth is worth an estimated £500 million. --Wikipedia

This explains so much.

355
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by november@lemmy.vg to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world

I would have asked this on a math community but I couldn't find an active one.

In a spherical geometry, great circles are "straight lines". As such, a triangle can have two or even three right angles to it.

But what if you go the long way around the back of the sphere? Is that still a triangle?

(Edit:) I guess it's a triangle! Fair enough; I can't think of what else you would call it. Thanks, everyone.

[-] november@lemmy.vg 25 points 2 months ago

Oh, well, if others are worse then I guess you're not doing anything wrong.

[-] november@lemmy.vg 21 points 2 months ago

At what point do carbrains become liable for destroying the environment?

3

My eyes were bigger than my stomach... At least I'll have leftovers.

17
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by november@lemmy.vg to c/vegancirclejerk@lemmy.world

Have you ever heard someone describe their cat as "magical"? They weren't being hyperbolic.

You see, cats are obligate carnivores. This is a kind of animal whose metabolism runs on magic. Their digestive systems use clairvoyance to determine whether the meal they're eating came from another animal. Nutrients have nothing to do with it -- if you try to feed them lab-synthesized taurine, the ancient curse laid upon their kind by the Egyptian sorcerers who bound them all those millennia ago will lay waste to all mankind.

Bet you feel stupid now, huh? Checkmate, vegoons.

[-] november@lemmy.vg 74 points 2 months ago

"Grow up and live in the real world" / "Life's not fair" / other thought-terminating cliches used to shut down anyone who wants the world to be a better place than it is. Like, I fucking know it's an unfair place. The whole point is that I would like for it to be less unfair.

[-] november@lemmy.vg 30 points 2 months ago

your distro has it prepackaged 1 version out of date

And the only reason you wanted to install the thing is because it's a prerequisite for some other thing you wanted to install, which requires the latest version.

[-] november@lemmy.vg 26 points 3 months ago

What do you mean by "misandry"?

If you mean "women venting about their experiences in a male-dominated world", then I don't give a shit. I just try not to be the reason they're complaining.

If you mean unrealistic emotional expectations for men, like we're not allowed to cry or be sensitive or feel any emotion but anger, it frustrates me. I don't really know how to handle it.

[-] november@lemmy.vg 16 points 3 months ago

This is what I've seen called "the subtractive fallacy".

People say "cars are bad, we should rely on them less", and instead of envisioning what that would actually mean, you just assume that the future they advocate for is exactly the same as the present but without cars. Of course that would suck. Good thing no one wants that.

view more: next ›

november

joined 6 months ago