the bottom two quadrants may be making that up.
look into static site generators
oh please block me
personally, I hate any automated bans. I think a human should be responsible for every ban.
the irony of insisting that a real human be involved, in this thread, is not lost on me.
I get it. but I just wanted to explain my minor reservation. I still upvoted the proposal.
I'd want multiple down votes to be the trigger, not a single down vote, and the result to be an alert to the mods/admins, not an automated ban
I think, and maybe I'm wrong, but it seems to me that
- there are a lot of anti-genai users grinding axes
- copyright is bad
- liberals tend to support law enforcement (including copyright law)
BUT
- I don't think banning anti-genai discourse is good
I know that's not the proposal. I just think it need to be explicitly stated
an instance block will stop db0 content from showing in your feed.. comments will still populate and users can still comment back to you.
it's another user entirely. they didn't ignore disengage, they are commenting on it
I don't think you know anything about her or her politics, but if you want to make a snap judgement based on one photo, who am I to try to stop you?
she was an invited guest who paid her own way to celebrate one of the new media outlets that would let her get her message out. she didn't make the seating chart.
for some people it's cheaper. for some it's not. for everyone though, regardless of how many beans you buy, the meat dairy and egg industries continue to pollute in ever greater amounts.