nsrxn

joined 4 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

absurd ideological basis (anarchy supporters)

I am not a community but can you please add me to your list

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

... bring your own mouse. keep it in your locker. your parents are at work. your siblings are at school. it's nbd.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

lower in calories

not everyone wants that.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

They allowed racist, misogynistic fascism to take firm root, good luck weeding it out now.

was that in the progressive era, when eugenics and fascism were the rage? the usa is fascist, and has been for all of living memory. blue-colored or red-colored isn't less fascism.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 weeks ago

they follow their own processes, use their own research, and come to their own conclusions based on what they consider to be the best available evidence.

some of that evidence was a paper which has since expired. if those organizations aren't updating their positions at least as frequently as the AND is, then we cannot believe that their positions are any more valid than the expired AND paper that they relied on

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 weeks ago

the expired paper doesn’t matter. It has no relevance

it's the exact paper linked in the initial comment to which I replied.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

And the page about childhood nutrition:

I wasn't reading carefully. I missed this. it doesn't change whether the other paper expired, is the current position of the academy, or whether papers that relied on it should be considered reliable unless they update.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

it's written on the paper itself: it expired in december of 2021, and is no longer the position of teh academy.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 weeks ago

You really need to take a look in the mirror and ask yourself why you’re trying so hard to lie about this.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 weeks ago

Especially in the context of every other health authority around the world affirming that a properly implemented plant-based diet is safe and adequate for all stages of life.

every such position i've seen relies on the now-expired AND position. they should not be considered valid unless they have also been updated and no longer rely on an expired position.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

You cannot draw that conclusion from that one article

the previous position expired. that is no longer the position of the academy. you can see all the current positions of the academy at https://www.jandonline.org/content/positionPapers

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

they let that position expire, and when they issued a new position, it specifically excluded them. the expired position is not their current position.

view more: ‹ prev next ›