[-] online@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago

Read the issues on that git and you'll see that it only works on comments visible from your profile which has a maximum limit. It doesn't get everything, because of that profile limit. There is a python script listed in there but it requires an API key.

[-] online@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago

What's the best method to mass edit my comments?

[-] online@lemmy.ml 9 points 10 months ago

Sorry, Snapz, we're discontinuing steaks to keep our restaurant stock value going up.

[-] online@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

They removed this support, because it was misleading users who thought they were getting E2EE when using it as an SMS client.

[-] online@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Speaking of this, what parts of the fediverse have added the option to block training generative AI to their respective robots.txt?

https://blog.google/technology/ai/an-update-on-web-publisher-controls/ https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/overview-google-crawlers https://techcrunch.com/2023/09/28/medium-hints-at-a-nascent-media-coalition-to-block-ai-crawlers/

It looks like there's a handful of these lines you'd have to add to robots.txt

Is there anywhere that keeps a comprehensive list of these?

[-] online@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

And let's be honest about who this is paying: Alphabet's 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Adversarial tech, like adblockers, is good. We should use it. If people want users to not want to use it, they should change the product so that we don't want to use it.

It's not illegal for me to use an ad blocker and it should never become illegal.

[-] online@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Wow this is great I am surprised to see people talking about this (let alone even being aware of it).

Really refreshing to not have it to be a contest to follow random dogmas.

Lemmy is refreshingly smarter than I was used to seeing on Reddit.

[-] online@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah if you read the scifi written during that time it's just a big male fantasy of easy access to loose women.

[-] online@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

I agree with you. Email is flawed and not appropriate for modern communication.

If you want the messages to be written in letter-like format, then you can write them that way. No need to make it chatty if you don't want to communicate that way.

Email shares far too much metadata and should be used just for account-updates, account-control (password reset, MFA, and so on), etc.

Otherwise I just push everyone to Signal, since it's normie-friendly and already using quantum-safe encryption.

--

To the OP's question: yes, I trust Proton. They can't access my data if they wanted to. They're a lot better than competing companies.

Check out some of the steps they've been taking to improve OpenPGP and go down to "Upcoming improvements" to see their future plans: https://proton.me/blog/openpgp-crypto-refresh

And, remember, they are more than just an email company: https://proton.me/blog

[-] online@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Out of fear of losing access to my accounts I've been moving them out of Gmail as the central point of control. I suggest other people do this too.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

online

joined 1 year ago