The articles that are linked are not easy to read but I guess they are targeted towards someone who is more enlightened about the broader context.
I think this is generally a big red flag. If there is an important point, then it should be possible to explain it in a way that everyone understands. If they link that to someone who is new, they might do it on purpose to avoid any discussion.
Good post! I just want to add something to the following part:
A lot of westerners seem to believe that a revolution is something that begins at a certain time, and then ends after some time, but I dont think thats true. What they are thinking about is the transfer of state power from one group to another, and that can indeed be very fast (like we saw in Afghanistan). But revolution is a continuous process that doesnt really have a start or end. Revolution also doesnt necessarily mean picking up weapons and fighting the police. It can be as simple as organizing with other like-minded people, and analysing the local material conditions.