133

Sources, a few more items and relevant Wikipedia articles are in 2024 in science.

Now making these quarterly instead of monthly (posted most of the previous ones only to reddit). I’m making these summaries so you can stay up to date with the latest science even if you only have little time. Also updating Wikipedia articles sooner or later.

You can get a quarterly email notification here. Non-included items and criteria can be found here.

61
Month in Science (lemmy.world)

Sources and relevant Wikipedia articles are in 2023 in science.

This is the latest summary and last one for 2023. I'm making these summaries so you can stay up to date even if you only have little time while updating Wikipedia articles. Monthly mail notification here. A few more items are in the Wiki article. Non-included items and criteria can be found here.

61

Quellen sind im WP Artikel 2023 in science zu finden. Mache diese monatlichen Zusammenfassungen seit einigen Jahren gemäß dieser Kriterien, damit man auch mit wenig Zeit mehr oder weniger auf dem aktuellen Stand der Forschung sein kann.

[-] prototyperspective@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

No, they just added lots of data for one of the multiple things that current emulation efforts (just like neural networks / brain-inspired AI software) so far didn't even include (neuropeptides).

There's no reason for why it would now be possible to simulate complex nervous system processes, but maybe this could enable getting closer to that. I don't know what you mean with "outside behavior" though. Maybe you're referring to the behavior in some simulation like this?

49

Sources + relevant Wikipedia articles are in 2023 in science.

Making the summaries so you can get up to date fast. Cut the number of tiles down from 10 to 8 (only 2 main items this time). Monthly notification. More items are in the WP article and non-included items with criteria are here.

16
2023 in science (en.wikipedia.org)

For reflection on science and its results and reviews of the year in science.
I'm interested in how to integrate these results into Wikipedia and society. Criteria for inclusion and non-included are here.

[-] prototyperspective@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

It's because the education system is utterly outdated across the world. No digital literacy, media literacy, or health literacy in the curriculum but lots of things you'll never need and forget to never be useful again within a few months. Studies should investigate things relating to this subject.

It's also because of the quality of search engine results but both are directly linked, people need to learn how to use search engines etc.

123
Month in Science (i.imgur.com)

Sources + relevant Wikipedia articles are in 2023 in science.
Making these summaries so you can stay up to date with the latest major studies in short time.

I also integrate most of the studies into Wikipedia; finding, editing & selection take most of the time, not the image. Monthly newsletter is here (I don't know if it still sends the mails properly sth happened to the upvotes a few months ago). This one is a bit late again since I get absolutely no benefit of doing this as a volunteer. Links to the criteria and list of nonincluded items; I've been making these summaries for >3 years for free. Check out the website Kialo for structured argument debates on topics like 'How did our universe begin'. More Wikipedia editors & devs and Wikimedia Commons science images contributors are needed.

Here's the sources for only the four main items:

[-] prototyperspective@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

It's more or less only (that is mainly) useful for building components that you then use in your man-made tracks. It's a tool, just like AI image generators are tools albeit there the replacement use-case is substantial. AI-generated voice also needs to be considered in this context I think.

[-] prototyperspective@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Es ist absolut verantwortungslos und unethisch dass es in Deutschland kein Organspende-by-Default System gibt. Das würde das Problem lösen und jeder der nicht spenden möchte schickt einfach einen Brief oder macht online einen Haken. Ich denke es bedarf nur einer politischen Entscheidung um diese vielen Leben zu retten.

Thank you! You can get notified via a monthly email. Let me know if they land in the spam-folder, I don't know if they do or did.

189
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by prototyperspective@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world

Sources & relevant Wikipedia articles: 2023 in science. Stay up to date with the latest major studies.

I also integrate most of the studies into Wikipedia; finding, editing & selection take most of the time, not the image. Monthly newsletter is here (I don't know if it still sends the mails properly).

I used to put all the sources here; here's the sources for only the six main items:

[-] prototyperspective@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes (200k–300.000), that's why it says pre-humans...we didn't arise out of nowhere, it was a continuous evolution and it seems like if those had died out we wouldn't be here. (However, that's not settled, there are substantial reasonable doubts over these results as hinted at with "While alternative explanations are possible" and elaborated in the other comments here.)

Good question, it wasn't a warming and even if it was, I don't think it can easily be translated to today's climate change. They refer to the Early-to-Middle Pleistocene Transition (not much info at that page though). If it's linked, that doesn't mean it caused it – I think people in that regard far too often think of (especially singular) causes instead of contributors within a complex interconnected set of causal factors. Maybe you're interested in this non-included paper from the same month which projects an upcoming large sudden population decline – it's just not substantiated and one can't just compare modern humans with other animal populations.

See the papers linked here

Here is the study (it both reduced workload and increased effectiveness), I don't think you understood what this was about but that's nothing to criticize with the brevity of text

[-] prototyperspective@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's why I put "While alternative explanations are possible" there.

I didn't add it to the WP article, and nothing here suggests this to be "conclusive"...it's just really 'significant' which even skeptics of this seem to agree with. Would be interesting if you have a source for "large number of assumptions" though: that doesn't seem to be a good description what people doubting it pointed out / criticized here: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/31/science/human-survival-bottleneck.html I previously had something like "Some peers doubt the study but if correct, [...]" there maybe that would be clearer?

106

🔔 Monthly Science Summary Brief overview of major studies - stay up-to-date

🔭 Sources & Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_in_science

12

Quellen & weiterführende Wikipedia-Artikel. Ich integriere die Studien auch in die EN Wikipedia.

Thanks, spending lots days on going through the >2k studies, criteria-based selection and integrating most of these into Wikipedia (the image itself takes less time). Happy to see it's appreciated.

[-] prototyperspective@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Because people are not so interested in reinventing the wheel a thousand times when there could be just 3 optimal open source solutions.

Also many products are plain useless or even harmful to society such as mundane noneducational distracting addictive mobile games.

192

Monthly Science Summary OC to reduce the time needed to get up-to-date with the latest major studies. Sources & related Wikipedia articles

151
[-] prototyperspective@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Could you license this image under CCBY so that it can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons? I'd add it to here. Let me know if that's okay or if CCBY is mentioned somewhere.

view more: next ›

prototyperspective

joined 1 year ago