qjkxbmwvz

joined 1 year ago
[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 3 points 4 months ago

What you say?!

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I kinda assumed any Mars mission would include some simple centrifugal pod. Seems like even if it's just for sleeping it would be useful.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 4 points 4 months ago

You know what you doing.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 2 points 4 months ago

Dispersion and nonlinearities would like to have a word ;)

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 8 points 4 months ago (7 children)
[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 11 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I'd like to know more.

In all seriousness though, I thought it had some aspects of good, which was odd given that it's satirical commentary on fascism. For instance, gender didn't really matter and women were promoted, and while the shower scene was meant to show how fascism castrates the masses (or something like that, iirc), I thought it was a relatively wholesome scene, all things considered.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I could be wrong, but I think this could be due to how the states' suit is worded? As in, I think it's worded as, "you can't do that in our state," and not, "you can't do that full stop."

From another site:

Attorneys general from 18 other states also sued over the order in federal court in Massachusetts.

Brown [AG filing the suit] noted his lawsuit is similar, but said he felt Washington should lead a separate case because of “specific and unique harms that are brought here.” He also said that “we have a very good set of judges in our bench here in Washington, so I feel like this is the right place.”

(My emphasis.)

So, a good first step, and while this should be struck down in its entirety, my reading is that this was a lawsuit with limited scope, and the injunction matches the limited scope.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If he introduced the hobbits to breakfast burritos and breakfast tacos, I'm pretty sure all would be forgiven.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago

I would bet that if you remux BBB to an mkv and play that through JF, it won't transcode


I think it will just remux it back to mp4. Just a guess...

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Interesting


I wonder if it only displays the first reason for having to mess with the stream, e.g., if it's really that it's an unsupported container, video, and audio codec.

Possible to try playing an h264 mkv (maybe Big Buck Bunny)? Since your screenshot is h265 I wonder if it indeed needs to transcode because that's unsupported (in addition to mkv).

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 1 points 5 months ago (9 children)

unless everyone is using hardware acceleration

I think that's what (almost) everyone does. My little N100 works just fine with QSV.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Is it definitely transcoding? JF can remix without transcoding iirc.

view more: ‹ prev next ›