slakemoth

joined 11 months ago
[–] slakemoth@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 3 months ago

Man i really hate being proved right about starmer - they aren't just as bad as the tories, they are literally making things worse. The problem is this lot actually believe in the nonsense they spout, the tories are just mates with capital owners, this lot are actually just boot lickers.

[–] slakemoth@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 months ago

i dont understand people like you

how is giving people less money going to improve their mental health? do you really think they just need a kick up the ass?

the benefit bill is such a small amount of money compared to what could be gained by wealth taxes or corp tax. the only reason it comes up is it distracts people from the real issues and makes a convenient political football.

[–] slakemoth@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 3 months ago

when will people stop believing this nonsense - governments aren't households balancing the books. the UK government has almost endless ability to borrow money.

what they don't have is the endless ability to do is spend money on public infrastructure as the IMF will decide the UK is no longer good for business and we would be outcast or strongarmed like Greece or Cuba.

Its perhaps politically not possible to go against the neoliberal consensus, but saying its do with economics is ideological clap trap

[–] slakemoth@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 3 months ago

what tough choices? they are just ideologically neo-liberal, they love doing austerity. they probably genuinely believe that disabled people are just lazy scroungers

[–] slakemoth@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Use your brain - if they are cutting it by 5bil then they will make it harder for people to get PIP that is undoubtedly true as how else would they make savings.

Those people will no longer be able to afford essentials. Hence, could become homeless.

many of those on PIP already work bear in mind.

In order to make savings, they will have to force those unable to work to work which will either cause them to have worsened chronic health issues (which will cost NHS more), or cause them to be homeless as they cant work, or force them to rely on carers even further.

The idea that there are lots of people on PIP who could work with some encouragement is frankly ridiculous

[–] slakemoth@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah totally agree

[–] slakemoth@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Even if that's true it doesn't stop them needing the money

The problem here is landlords not benefit claimant's

Get rid of landlords, they can simply sign on

[–] slakemoth@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 3 months ago

The red tape being removed just means lower quality housing. Don't fall for sloganeering.

[–] slakemoth@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Isnt the main issues that voters have the cost of living, failing nhs, landlords?

Planning regulations aren't going to see any wins, nor is improving energy girds, important as those things are.

Its been shown that increases in housing stock has minimal effects on rent prices. A very cheap solution to this is rent control, it literally costs nothing. They could also build social housing if they wanted to invest money in something useful.

The NHS needs money, there is no getting around this unfortunately. All the fat trimming has been done.

Cost of living is obviously more complicated and i won't pretend to understand that level of macro. But you seem to be concerned that increases in deficit ie borrowing would cause debts to increase. This always happens when any government does anything remotely left wing, look at how the USA treats cuba. The political fact is that to be left wing you have to accept USA aligned countries making it more expensive for you to borrow. If Corbyn had won we would have been battered by this, but the trick is to nationalise the economy and become independent.

I can sympathise with some of what you're saying,but you make it out as if néolibéral policy is capable of doing those things as well as positioning it as the only route possible, which is disingenuous. You're making a political statement, not a descriptive diagnosis.

[–] slakemoth@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

All i can see this cut doing is forcing carers to work extra jobs if they can, or forcing more people onto the street. It won't get any of these people into work.

[–] slakemoth@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 3 months ago

No they just do it more politely a la lib dems

[–] slakemoth@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 3 months ago

The problem is not the factual accuracy of what he's saying but why he would say it.

To anyone who follows politics even remotely, Wes clearly here is doing a dog whistle. He's signalling to the boomers that labour also thinks people with mental health issues are just lazy. Hes doing reactionary politics on purpose.

view more: ‹ prev next ›