The other commenter is completely correct here. If you don’t point to the exact material on which you’re basing your argument, you haven’t cited the material.
splinter
joined 4 months ago
There are other verification procedures in place as well. This is something like a failsafe.
What do you think it would take?
Yup. The phrase “EV truck maker” is doing a lot of work in this title.
Yup
Keep at it!
You’ve got nothing, sorry.
You’ve failed at addressing my argument directly, failed at building a straw man, so I guess it makes sense you’d be trying ad hominem.
There are plenty of fake accounts in existence.
You don’t know either way, which makes your attribution entirely fallacious.
You really can’t address the argument I made, can you?
Your comment was so reductive as to be indistinguishable from bad faith equivalency. The claim that you didn’t mean to speaks only to your naivety.
You can’t just ignore parts of the argument to which you have no answer.
You don’t know who that person is or whether they even exist. It is beyond spurious to assign their statements to any other entity.
Are you doing alright?