[-] surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone 11 points 10 months ago

On a completely unrelated note, I was scrolling down the article and saw a big X and clicked it thinking it was a popup or ad and hit it out of habit, but it was actually the embedded tweet.

Another reason why the X rebrand is dumb.

[-] surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone 6 points 10 months ago

Think there's a greater relevance here. He's speaking to a newly formed political think tank that current members of our parliament are actively engaged with. It speaks to the underlying values that one of our major political parties is actively leaning into.

[-] surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone 7 points 10 months ago

I disagree. A society is more than culture. It's politics, law and economics, which are the pieces that actually run a society. I would never suggest migrants should ever import politics, economics and laws from their home country.

Culture and religion however, are personal things. There's no need to force those on anyone. If a society feels the need to do this, it has a tolerance problem and they ought to ask themselves, why does someone praying to a different god, speaking a different language or celebrating a foreign event threaten you?

[-] surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone 7 points 10 months ago

What's the difference between "respect their culture" and "Federation of tribes and culture". Either you take the view that "respect their culture" means allowing people to retain and freely exercise their culture in public, e.g. speaking their language and celebrating their cultural events publicly, in which case it's really indistinguishable to a federation of cultures. The alternative view is, people can only speak English and practice English cultural things in public, in which case is that really "respecting their culture"?

I suspect Howard is dog-whistling the latter, because Australia is doing the former, and it certainly doesn't sound like he's supportive of that, otherwise why would be have so much trouble with it?

[-] surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone 7 points 10 months ago

The Romans after they defeated the Greeks.

[-] surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone 7 points 11 months ago

There was a podcast episode, I think from Democracy Sausage, that talked about how historically referendum no campaigning parties actually do poorly in the subsequent general election since they lean in to absolutely insane arguments during the campaign, which gets them the referendum win, but the loss in the general election. I hope that happens here.

[-] surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone 7 points 11 months ago

I thought voting no was supposed to end the division?

[-] surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone 15 points 11 months ago

Well looks like we know what Price has got for selling out her people. Now we just gotta find out what Warren Mundine's pay day is.

[-] surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago

Seems like she was convicted on a technicality, possibly that by the letter of the law she committed the crime, even if it was done under duress and she didn't benefit from it.

It seems the judge recognised this by not recording a conviction against her and no additional jail time. The bond seems unfair though but maybe it's to provide assurance that she won't start the prostitution ring again.

[-] surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This might be harsh but I have little sympathy for this woman. Remember she was the news anchor at CGTN from 2012 - 2020 and based on Beijing at that time. CGTN is a state owned news (i.e. propaganda) outlet. She was an Australian Citizen prior to taking that position, so surely she should be aware of what she was walking into a conflict between Australian values of freedom and the oppression that the CGTN apparatus represents.

Instead of being an ethical and fearless journalist, she picked money, clout and prestige, betraying the very principles of the country that she's pleading for sympathy from now.

The fact that the role become a poisoned chalice is entirely predictable. It's disappointing that our government is now having to expend political capital for her.

[-] surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone 10 points 1 year ago

Apartments are extremely small already so I'd argue they need to be bigger for people to even consider having families in. 1 bedroom apartments are like 60-70m2 which is terrible for 1 person, and 2 bedroom apartments are like 70-80m2 ish. There's no space for even a dining table and a couch. You have to choose one or the other. Who would pick apartment living as a long term option, rather than just a stepping stone home, in these conditions?

[-] surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago

And he stopped being the PM the second he took a microstep on climate change. So that's really proof that he didn't have any real power.

1
view more: next ›

surreptitiouswalk

joined 1 year ago