No. I upgrade my Ubuntus before they go EOL so I don't need ESM.
Most places that want ESM do so because they can't get away from EOL versions. I refuse to get stuck in that swamp myself, so I run LTS and migrate/rebuild them when necessary.
synestine
joined 2 years ago
That's so strange, one of the first things my searches turned up is "Disable the TMDb Box Sets plugin because it causes problems"...
Ah, so you're the kind who loves bitching about things online, but won't lift a finger to defend themself, gotcha.
What I mentioned prior doesn't change anything about library management in the slightest, you just wanted an excuse.
The reverse proxy is the part that's exposed. CrowdSec watches the logs for intrusion attempts like fail2ban would.
If you're worried about it, make sure to not use a default path. Then legit clients are fine but these theoretical attackers get stymied.
Yes it is completely normal. The Internet is almost but not quite as bad as security wonks claim. Especially since you're not on the default port, most scanners don't have the programming to attempt on Home assistant. Most of them are built for more common exploits.
If you look at your proxy logs, you'll see attempts at various random paths, but those should all be 404 or 403s.
SSHFS uses SFTP which is built into SSH, so no server to install. Its not as fast as NFS, but requires no setup. For something small like a home lab, that is a big advantage.
Dozens? Name three, and be sure to include number of aps in each ecosystem.
I'm sure there are dozens of Chinese smart watches, but most that I've seen are white-labels and sorely missing an ecosystem.
Methinks you underestimate the complexity.
And all the other watch makers I've looked at are not doing, or even considering, what Pebble did.
Because good software is hard. The PebbleOS is a gem, and no, no one could in 9 years.
view more: next ›
If you've optimized your BIOS settings (balanced mode or power saving wherever possible), the only other option is removing extraneous hardware. All hardware power use (disks, HBAs, other adapters and controllers) adds up. I managed to get idle power consumption of an HP DL-380 G9 down to about 60w (started at 210w) by removing the disks, RAID controller and battery, fiber channel adapters, and extra Ethernet adapter. Each SAS disk I removed saved me 10w. I used one M.2 drive in a PCI adapter instead.
Like you mentioned, these aren't designed to save power. That Opteron (and the chip set) hales from a time before "performance per watt" was a thing.