You know, it was a serious question but I can’t argue with this answer. Case dismissed.
Serious question: what makes the ‘tackle’ by the security guard NOT assault?
There was no prevention of a crime that would normally warrant force. In most places you have to be asked to leave before it’s trespassing.
That seemed overly aggressive for a first reaction.
AI Tools - plural. ChatGPT (and OpenAI as a whole) predominantly runs on Azure infrastructure. Microsoft also owns GitHub with its associated copilot. And now all the Microsoft product specific copilots.
Not trying to defend their usage, but there are several forests here that are quite visible.
I knew he was nutty, but holy fuck this guy is actually insane.
If you haven’t, watch at least the first minute of the video. That’s all you need to have your jaw hit the floor at the crazy.
I am choosing to believe that the hyphenated word should be ‘killer-crab’ for a much more entertaining and terrifying article.
But…it was ‘almost done’…what happened to it? Did Obama’s dog eat it?
Did you read the article? Pretty clear it’s more than even harassment…
“These jurors have signed their death warrant by falsely indicting President Trump," a post on a pro-Trump forum read in response to a post including the names of jurors, which was viewed by NBC News.
Also, Grand Juries are secret, regular juries are not. That’s why these articles are all referring to them as the ‘purported’ jurors.
If they did somehow actually get the jury members names and release them, that alone could (and should) be seen as a threat considering the secret nature.
If you are on their network they can see what you are doing. At the end of the day, the business will protect itself.
Do what you want at your own risk. But never assume that any company is on your side.
I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again. The fact that these articles are making fairly large headlines is proof enough that this event is backfiring.
A couple days of engagement traffic do not outweigh the negative PR and advertising impact from this event.
If you were a company, you might think twice before advertising on a site that has their users actively, publicly, and loudly trashing on the CEO. It says a lot that it’s happening in the first place. Says even more that they aren’t able to stop it.
Also, look at the activity numbers here. I’m not trying to trash on Lemmy, but we are a drop on the bucket. It’s far more effective for us to be visible and loud than silent and ignored.
For clarity sake, I’m not encouraging anyone to go do anything, nor the other way around. But if you want to, ignore the comments, saying that this is going to say, Reddit with traffic and engagement from you if you go. It clearly isn’t, and your loud protest is valuable. 
They did.
And this is from 2013. The last line is particularly poignant.
Speaking of Congress, its members seem to be the only people in America getting as much down time as the medieval peasant. They get 239 days off this year.
Nothing says that the !android@lemmy.world will be locked forever. They wrote a well thought out post, pinned it, and encouraged people to move to their new home. No one was strong armed. No one needs to go make new accounts. Everyone needs to take a breath.
Would you rather they had deleted the community and said nothing? Everyone is up and arms over something that was created DAYS ago.
Pretty sure the 2nd advisor isn’t actually a computer scientist/developer or if they are they are absolutely employed as Technical Sales for a consulting company. Otherwise their answer would have looked incredibly similar.