ubergeek

joined 7 months ago
[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 5 points 2 months ago (13 children)

Worse for whom?

Things haven't changed a bit for my indigenous neighbors. They are being fucked over just as hard now, as before...

My black neighbors have noticed just as much now as before, cops still abusing their community and their still being ignored economically.

So, worse for white people? Sure.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 18 points 2 months ago (27 children)

Every single one of those elections, the Dems chanting "us or fascism!!"

It's kinda like the gun safety debate: we can not discuss it within 72 hrs of a mass shooting.

After 72 hrs, nobody wants to talk about it, or we have another one.

When will the Dems actually oppose fascism, instead of saying they want to?

Additionally, who is that "boring liberal republic" better for? Certainly not Palestinians. Certainly not for union workers on our rail lines. Not for people becoming houseless. Not for queer people. Not for indigenous peeps, either....

So, just for white, straight people, so we need to keep supporting it?

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago

I was l33t, and signed up with Prodigy!

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago

I mean, he’s having an easier time getting laid than most of the people criticizing him on these forums so…

That's a bit of projection. Especially when a lot of people shit talking him on these forums are very likely in polycules...

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It did not, and it had the nickname AOLosers for people using the service.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 24 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Or he's your friend's weird, 28 year old brother, whose room is only lit with black lights, and UV reactive posters, has no job, smokes weed all day, and trips all the time, who tells you Mayans invented cell phones.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think a lot had to do with Harris telling e eryone the economy was great, while her potential voters can barely make ends meet, while her opponent was agreeing with the voters that the economy sucked.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I said they were deemed unfit. Like women and children, the elderly, etc. Of course, some women were kept for sex slaves, too. Others were kept for medical experimentation, etc etc.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today -4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Yes, those 1.47 million were those deemed unfit for labor.

Nothing you said disagrees with what I said.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

Dying wasn't the goal, for the concentration camps, either, generally. It was creation of a slave labor race. Generally, the ones who were exterminated right out where the ones incapable of work (In the German's eyes).

Kinda the same with slavery. Incapable of hard labor Black people were just put down.

And is murdering them via forced labor different if it only happens in select camps, versus in the cotton fields? Is time frame a difference, really? 6 years to die vs 20 years to die... Honestly, the former is likely more "humane"...

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago

Grand Daddy Purp, like 2g or so, in a natty sweet wrap :)

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, because it would lead them to believe gang members are also being killed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›