Yes, sorry... the militia clause, as its known
The purpose of the militia is to put down insurrection, not to engage in it.
The word "regulated" has had only one actual meaning... the same as it means to regulate interstate commerce.
And only a couple of years later, the militia acts passed.
I pray you actually read what people point you too:
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law
He was literally telling them live on TV to go storm the Capitol.
That is called "prima facie": facts that speak for themselves.
And it is fully valid to use as a test in a process already codified in law: secretary of state (or similar postition) decides ballot eligibility.
Nah, I was only replying to the part about you not being a 2a supporter, showing you dont have to be, in order to support an armed working class 😀
We didn’t see Trump break into the White House.
We saw him tell his people to go do it, and the refuse to tell them to stop it.
That's called "leading an insurrection".
I'm not keen on the 2A, based on it's original purpose and use. I am, however, pro "Under no pretext shall arms and ammunition be surrendered, and any attempts to do should be frustrated, by force, if necessary."
For all those reasons you named, are exactly the reasons I don't want Dems curtailing the right to keep and bear arms.
Notice ICE focusing on low gun ownership regions?
We're not all in the same group... I'm not an ICE agent, but I am a gun toting ~~American~~ working class person.
Due process includes the process of your ballot eligibility being reviewed, and then denied, based on things that are prima facie.