There's no doubt the visual quality is and will be better in many ways but not when it comes to the actual passthrough video which will never be as good as just showing reality directly.
AVP can also still be a mistake because it released now at an insane price point and without that light form factor. Doesn't really help the case that some day it can be light, especially when Apple didn't really even try with this one.
@virtualreality@lemmy.world might be a little early to expect hearing about them... aside from the Xbox one that I thought was just branding for your standard Quest but that one would probably do better if unveiled at an Xbox event.
@MyOpinion@lemm.ee @virtualreality@lemmy.world this seems like a perfect fit for VR so I'm really glad it first became playable with the excellent UEVR and then modded to make the experience much better. Sticking augmentations on your head just feels that much more real when you're in VR. I do wonder if the SS2 VR support they once floated for the enhanced edition is still in the cards...
only ones I can think of are some pretty simple Lovecraft-themed games with XCOM-style turn-based tactical gameplay
For the ecosystem something like Quest 3 that a substantial number of people can actually afford would probably help way more. For feedback they probably do usability testing etc. anyway.
While I do appreciate that Apple threw their hat in the ring and found some of their designs very interesting to look at I am overall fairly puzzled when it comes to the question of what exactly did releasing AVP achieve.
@virtualreality@lemmy.world