xia

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
 

So it turns out that the turing test is surprisingly weak and useless, and what AI marketing hype can you actually believe?

It goes without saying that models are trained on human input, and by now we all know that LLMs degrade rather quickly when they are trained on AI-generated input, so that got me thinking: Wouldn't that make a clear measure/metric of "how human" or "how intelligent" a model is?

I would like to see models measured on how quickly they degrade when "poisoned" with their own output.

Yes, we would still need a secondary metric to measure/detect the collapse, but this sort of scale would be elastic enough to measure and compare the most brain-dead LLMs, humans (the unity point), and even theoretical models that actually could improve themselves (over-unity).

Even if unity would be impossible with our current approach to LLMs, it might also let us compare LLMs to whatever "the next" big AI thing is that comes down the pipe, and completely cut through the cheaty marketing hype of those LLMs that are specifically trained on the intelligence questions/exams by which they would be measured.

[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Did they just kind of forget about Joe Biden?

[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago

As a separator, I've found an at-sign or underscore to be more readable.

For my next project I may forego date formatting altogether and just use a decimal unix time. That way, systems that use whole seconds and those that use milliseconds both can get along, and it is less "earth centric" and not time-zone-ambiguous.

[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 days ago (5 children)

That "T" though...

[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago

The competition doesn’t need to be open, they just need to motivate Google to be open.

...but could that actually happen? I'm not sure what WOULD motivate Google to be open. Even if there were three or four more major mobile players (all with equal market share), and Google had the only platform that allowed unblessed software to be installed, I'm not sure that would pressure Google to continue to be "the open choice", but more likely to take this same action as "the odd man out".

At a fundamental level, there is an illusion/concept planted in the human mind that "force answers everything", and when they run out of ideas (or all the ideas that they have would require too much [re]work to their liking) the tendency is to fall back onto "just use force" as an easy "solution".

[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

As a developer, I wonder why they don't just use the API where it is still available. It might even be usable without any client software via there own "playground" page.

[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

If I had to guess, I would speculate that their motivation is a long-term play to squash the general perception that Android has more malware (and is therefor less secure) than iPhone. Just about every article I've seen to that effect includes (1) enable unknown sources, and (2) install this malware app; so they probably see the current hurdles as insufficient and intend to perma-ban dev accounts that they find signing malware apps.

259
yoink (lemmy.ml)
[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 5 days ago

It's rude to call people accidents, even if it's often true. :)

[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 days ago

Read it again, more carefully... :)

 

...but just about any conventional computer can safely be used with any adequately maintained Linux distro, regardless of age.

 

It impedes traffic. Plain and simple. Roads are built to be access-ways, not a place to store your private property.

Would you object to be storing a pallet of shingles along the side of the road? It takes up less space than your car!

It's even worse if you park in front of someone else's house, as it blocks a small bit of access/use of that property too. Now I can't put my bins out on the curb where I would like, or you parked in from of them so they were not collected.

...and it's even worse still when there is a long chain of cars parked on both sides of the street. It is plain to see that the road no longer has the same utility. It used to be bidirectional, and now it's a single lane, and the responsibility is diffuse as no one car owner feels responsible for the hindrance (it's all the OTHER cars).

It's not my fault that you have too many cars or not enough driveway/garage space on your property. Keep it out of the public right-of-way.

 
view more: next ›