26
350
27
42
28
48
29
41
30
117
submitted 2 weeks ago by lemmee_in@lemm.ee to c/workreform@lemmy.world

Notorious for a hardworking culture, Japan launched an initiative to help people cut back. But three years into the effort, the country is having a hard time coaxing people to take a four-day workweek.

Japanese lawmakers first proposed a shorter work week in 2021. The guidelines aimed to encourage staff retention and cut the number of workers falling ill or dying from overwork in an economy already suffering from a huge labor shortage. The guidelines also included overtime limits and paid annual leave.

However, the initiative has had a slow start: According to the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, only about 8% of companies in Japan allow employees to take three or more days off a week.

It's not just companies — employees are hesitant, too.

Electronics manufacturer Panasonic, one of Japan's largest companies, opted into the effort in early 2022. Over two years in, only 150 of its 63,000 eligible employees have chosen to take up four-day schedules, a representative of the company told the Associated Press.

Other major companies to introduce a four-day workweek include Uniqlo parent Fast Retailing, electronics giant Hitachi, and financial firm Mizuho. About 85% of employers report giving workers the usual two days off a week.

Much of the reluctance to take an extra day off boils down to a culture of workers putting companies before themselves, including pressure to appear like team players and hard workers. This intense culture stems from Japan's postwar era, where, in an effort to boost the economy, then-Prime Minister Shigeru Yoshida enlisted major corporations to offer their employees lifelong job security, asking only that workers repay them with loyalty.

31
77
submitted 2 weeks ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world
32
433
33
96
34
19
The Tech-Trump Alliance (www.theatlantic.com)

A conversation with Ali Breland about the long-simmering ideas animating Silicon Valley’s rightward turn.

35
170
36
465
submitted 2 weeks ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world
37
594

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/rRQ5W

38
1972
39
163
submitted 2 weeks ago by lemmee_in@lemm.ee to c/workreform@lemmy.world

Indian IT firm Infosys has been accused of being “exploitative” after allegedly sending job offers to thousands of engineering graduates but still not onboarding any of them after as long as two years. The recent graduates have reportedly been told they must do repeated, unpaid training in order to remain eligible to work at Infosys.

Last week, the Nascent Information Technology Employees Senate (NITES), an Indian advocacy group for IT workers, sent a letter [PDF], shared by The Register, to Mansukh Mandaviya, India’s Minster of Labor and Employment. It requested that the Indian government intervene “to prevent exploitation of young IT graduates by Infosys." The letter signed by NITES president Harpreet Singh Saluja claimed that NITES received “multiple” complaints from recent engineering graduates “who have been subjected to unprofessional and exploitative practices” from Infosys after being hired for system engineer and digital specialist engineer roles.

According to NITES, Infosys sent these people offer letters as early as April 22, 2022, after engaging in a college recruitment effort from 2022–2023 but never onboarded the graduates. NITES has previously said that “over 2,000 recruits” are affected.

NITES claims the people sent job offers were asked to participate in an unpaid, virtual “pre-training” that took place from July 1, 2024, until July 24, 2024. Infosys' HR team reportedly told the recent graduates at that time that onboarding plans would be finalized by August 19 or September 2. But things didn’t go as anticipated, NITES’ letter claimed, leaving the would-be hires with “immense frustration, anxiety, and uncertainty.”

40
343
41
72
42
553
submitted 2 weeks ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world
43
134
submitted 3 weeks ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world
44
22
submitted 3 weeks ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world
45
201
46
193

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/21333338

Huzzah!

47
106
48
186
49
158
submitted 3 weeks ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world
50
89
submitted 3 weeks ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world
view more: ‹ prev next ›

Work Reform

9809 readers
101 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS