this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
1634 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

14742 readers
510 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 60 points 10 months ago (4 children)

B-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-but tHiNk Of AlL tHe LoSt ShArEhOlDeR vAlUe ThO!?

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 34 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Seriously though, if crabs used currency this would never happen. There would be one crab with all the shells and the other crabs would have to bring food offerings or whatever their currency would be in order to get one.

[–] MarcomachtKuchen@feddit.org 23 points 10 months ago

Shellholder value

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Even crypto achieved carcinisation

[–] AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Web 3.0? More like Wet 3.0 amiright people?!

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 5 points 9 months ago

I counted the word "institutional" used almost once per sentence. There were a couple of sentences that didn't use it, but there was at least one sentence that used it twice. Plus all the figures and captions for them too.

Though despite being not "institutional", the market seems to have behaved a little as if it were, due to use of software to fix prices at what the landlords believed that the market would bear. So still price gouging, regardless of whether done by individuals or giant mega-corporations.

Though still a good point that the article makes.