Ok but how funny would that subplot have been if she was pushing a fucking hotdog stand around king's landing and exactly nobody was addressing it as if it wasn't the most normal thing in the world?

So apparently that piss smell wasn't actually from the open sewage.

It was because before cars took over horses were the primary mode of transport for people who could afford it, and horse piss is absolutely rancid smelling if it lands on something that doesn't just absorb it like dirt or soil.

You joke with the sea bug jokes but apparently dishes that use bug meat actually are compared to crab and lobster in taste.

You may think you're disgusting, but you ain't "getting so into scat fetish that god themself makes an entire religious dictat about avoiding your nasty ass" disgusting

It's funny because they compared themself to a picture of one of the worst people imagined to argue they're a good person

You'd think so but the foot fetishists are in the same kind of space as furry porn commissioners.

Bidet gang

See the thing about the supposed cycle of violence is that it implies equal fault and innocence of both sides. It relies on toleration theory.

Toleration is a treaty, when you break it you are no longer protected by it. It is an entirely justifiable and moral act to instigate violence against fascists, because their very ideology is a violation of the treaty of toleration, and their organization is one which cannot sustain itself in the face of repeated attacks.

You often hear complaints about how enforcing internet rules against the fascists just leads to whackamole bans, but the thing is that every successive ban leaves the fascists less coordinated, less emboldened, and more isolated. There is a critical point of punitive and preventative acts where a fascist org is effectively atomized and anyone worth pulling out has been rock bottomed into a holding space where they can be rehabbed.

Peaceful methods are what can be achieved after you've destroyed them, either through hounding operations making it less and less possible for them to group up and act together, or by normalizing violence and intolerance against them to the extent that they are at least afraid enough to stop trying to not be sniveling cowards such as the fascist naturally is.

The true fascist is only kept quiet in an environment of fear, where they know that trying to stick their heads up will get it lopped off in short order. An environment where even peacible means of antifascism still include complete social ostracism and career destruction, and where persistent fascism is met with swift and appropriate violent rejection.

Don't just punch the Nazis, dox them to their families and employers and communities, encourage others to be armed and ready to attack preemptively in their presence, organize around making that Nazi specifically know their rightful place is silent and afraid until they've cut the shit and stopped being a nazi, before someone ends up killing them in self defense.

Collapse theory is fundamentally a privileged take. It is a position that is impossible to accept without either the assumption that you'd survive, or the assumption that the disproportionate harm to the disadvantaged is worth it for your end goals even if you die too.

Either way, you're declaring that your paradise can and should be built over the bodies of the disemprivileged, and are automatically wrong and a horrible person for even being able to think that way.

You are the exact kind of monster that built the colonialist model of Israel, just insisting that your nation built on the bodies of the innocent will be a more moral one somehow.

You can tell they're white because they think demanding to see genocide's manager is more effective than voting against even more genocide happening.

Probably more that she's angling for her slice of the inheritance.

Man literally is a suspected child rapist, yet the supposed anti-groomers would personally offer him their infant children to rape before they ever even dreamed of applying any standards to him.

It's the logical conclusion of their association based morality. Don could actually murder someone on 5th avenue and the right would never give an inch on it because he's their bastard and they'll take their bastards over an outsider's angels every day of the week.

They don't believe it's evil for satanists to run a soup kitchen because they suspect an ulterior motive, they believe it's evil because the satanists are evil so everything they do is evil because nothing an evil person does is ever a good thing. Same time, one of their own could be caught hacking school children to death with a machete and they'll go to the extent of bashing their head into a wall until they forget their own now murdered children because he's one of their own and "we don't need outsiders to tell us how to handle our issues."