this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
265 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

74055 readers
5418 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
265
OpenAI has built a text watermarking method to detect chatgpt written content (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 1 year ago by PenisDuckCuck9001@lemmynsfw.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
67 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Am I missing something? The article seems to suggest it works via hidden text characters. Has OpenAI never heard of pasting text into a utf8 notepad before?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheHobbyist@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think it exists and works but that its simply not in their best interest to have people use it and be found out that they used chatgpt, for OpenAI's business/profit potential. I have nothing to back it up but have just lost all faith in OpenAI.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Im willing to believe it exists, but not that its any good. 99% is a crazy accuracy claim.

[–] pup_atlas@pawb.social 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I van totally believe that it detects AI generated content 99% of the time, that’s trivial. What I really wanna know is the false positive rate. If I write a program that flags everything, it’d have a 100% hit rate. It’d also however have a crazy high false positive rate.

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yup, noticable that they use the phrase "99.9% effective". Effective doesnt have a defined meaning in this contect, unlike accuracy, sensitivity or specificity, so that smells of missleading PR speak to me.

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Especially if the claim that it's undetectable by humans.

[–] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They sell the cheating tool and the detection software

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

It's really sweet to play the arms race with oneself.