968
submitted 2 months ago by meldrik@lemmy.wtf to c/wtf@lemmy.wtf
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Fosheze@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago

It really depends on the location and situation. With the new generations of reactors they can also do things like seawater desalination with the waste heat alongside power production. You also have situations where the nuclear waste heat is used to heat entire communities far more efficiently than could be done with electricity. There are also many places where solar and wind just aren't practical for various reasons. In those areas nuclear may be a good option for base load power. Nuclear is also still far less environmentally destructive than hydro.

Yes, nuclear power plants are henoiusly expensive and there are definitely areas that they shouldn't be built, but they do still serve a purpose in certain areas. Most of the flack nuclear gets is just because most of our reactor fleet was built durring the cold war. New technologies can acheive far more with nuclear power far more safely and cost effectively than those old reactors.

this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
968 points (97.5% liked)

WTF

779 readers
2 users here now

The average c/WTF enjoyer

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS