107
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
107 points (94.2% liked)
United States | News & Politics
1923 readers
320 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The guardian is three tabloids in a trenchcoat.
They don't generally outright lie, but unbiased journalism it is not.
To be clear, the interview was a shitshow, I'm just saying you'll need to manage your expectations about journalistic quality when reading the guardian.
they do clearly separate their reporting and commentary though, they always indicate on page in print and online that it is a comment not a report (literally the first word on this page is "Opinion")
They do yes, this is clearly marked as an opinion piece.
What i was trying to convey is to not expect stellar journalism, opinion or otherwise, from a media source that has built it's readership on sensationalism and tabloid shenanigans.
That is of course, just my personal opinion.
Thanks for your Input! Your Analogy makes perfect sense to me and gave me a good chuckle^^
I‘m not too familiar with the guardian but I do remember reading some Articles of great journalistic Quality.
I learned that it is marked as an „Opinion Piece“ but how can you value the opinion of a Journalist you do not know?