1282
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I think someone benefits from creating that expectation, but nobody I've talked to wants to bring back cold war era mental institutions.

[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There are literally people itt advocating for it. I have seen people advocate for putting homeless in prisons and even concentration/work camps. People 100000% advocate for that type of psychiatric institution. In fact, per the link in my previous comment, the vast majority of psychiatric institutions are this type of "lockdown" institution and it is actually an exception to the norm and a new style of institution to do the permeable institution. So if you mean a permeable institution, you should specify that if you want to be understood, because that's what common use means.

Words mean things. People are cruel. Can't assume you aren't cruel. Use right word if you want to be understood.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Oh I know there are people advocating to abuse homeless people. But when you assume all mental health facilities are lockdown facilities for dangerous people you're hurting the entire mental health community. When pressed, people do not want lockdown facilities.

[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Okay, great. Maybe next time clarify your meaning by saying "permeable institutions" or "assisted living," so that people don't assume you're using the most common colloquial definition of "institution," and so you don't accidentally spread pro-traditional institution messages.

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
1282 points (98.1% liked)

Solarpunk Urbanism

1796 readers
1 users here now

A community to discuss solarpunk and other new and alternative urbanisms that seek to break away from our currently ecologically destructive urbanisms.

Checkout these related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS