[-] Five@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The second half of Luthen’s conversation with Saw is him trying to convince Saw to lend air support to another faction so that they can make a combined hit on an Imperial power station. In rage, Saw tells off Luthen for calling his adherence to his own ideology as “petty differences” and says that he’s not risking his people for someone else. Saw has a reputation for being an extremist, and Luthen knows that his operation is well-funded and successful. Saw, however, is right to refuse the tactical alliance.

I'd like to add that the doomed faction Luthen was trying to get Saw to support were remnants of the separatist forces from the Clone Wars. The Separatists were often coded in fiction as the Confederate side of the US Civil War by emphasizing their role as the aggressor and their colonial / pro-slavery politics. Names in Star Wars often are linguistic and historical references, with Gerrera being both similar to Guerrera (warrior in Castilian) and the character is directly inspired by Che Guevara, for example. The name Anto Kreegyr conjures the German word 'Krieger' which also means warrior. This is perhaps intentional to draw a comparison between Saw and Anto, both warriors and rebels, but with very different implied motivations. Anto is linguistically similar to Anton, a common Slavic name. The German language is unfortunately closely associated with the Kaiser during WWI and Nazis during WWII to English audiences, and Russian is similarly associated with the authoritarian Soviet Union.

The implied subtext is that the opportunist Luthen wants the anarchists to work with fascists and authoritarians in the name of defeating a greater fascist threat. Saw's outrage at the suggestion is much more reasonable given this interpretation, as well as his eventual decision to permit their sacrifice to increase the chances of ultimate victory.

2
submitted 22 hours ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/feminism@lemmy.world
4
submitted 22 hours ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/women@lemmy.world
[-] Five@slrpnk.net 13 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

No, it invigorated it.

Bloody Sunday in Selma was one of the most successful protests in history, where police disproportionately responded to nonviolent disobedience by beating marchers with batons. It was successful not in spite of police violence, but because of it. The hundreds of demonstrators grew to thousands as people came from all across the country in solidarity.

A new Trump era means a renaissance of civil disruption. The methods competent police have developed to blunt the effect of protest don't project the strong-man image fascists crave. Protest will become much more dangerous again, but will also become much more effective.

[-] Five@slrpnk.net 30 points 1 day ago

They don't want to give up their share of rich donors and insider trading privileges.

166
submitted 1 day ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
[-] Five@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

New details about a program from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) are getting attention after the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) published a trove of internal documents about ICE’s ‘Citizens Academy’ programs.

9
submitted 1 day ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/politics@beehaw.org
83

A slide show presentation titled, “Gun PowerPoint 2,” covers training on engaging targets when in street clothes. The instruction advises students to yell “‘Drop the gun!’ while drawing and firing on the target.” Also under the title, “Engaging Targets,” the training suggests that “videos, cameras, phones, and witnesses” are targets to engage presumably to limit “Monday morning quarterbacking” from the public.

[-] Five@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

If you live in the SF area, the OP is looking for help to get the inside too.

[-] Five@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This kind of behavior was rampant in Reddit city subreddits. People would frequently post a crime story featuring a racial minority, and then others would come out of the woodwork to engage in creative writing exercises about the kind of punishment the suspect deserved. More often then not, they would use racially charged language to describe the suspect. The mods would typically downplay the seriousness of what they were doing, administer wrist-slap bans when pressed, and then eventually permaban the lefties calling racists out.

I'm happy to say that's not a problem with local comms like the ones in Midwest.social that I've seen.

5
submitted 2 days ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/art@slrpnk.net
88
submitted 2 days ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/anarchism@slrpnk.net
[-] Five@slrpnk.net 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Threads.net federation status on major Lemmy instances based on blocklist info:

Also, in memoriam:

[-] Five@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

YDI: You called @silence7 a shill for phonebanking. As a mod, he has no obligation to take your abuse.

[-] Five@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It's called Tractorbeam Earth because it's a quarterly publication run as a sweepstakes by Tractor Beverages, Inc.

Tractor Beverages is a corporation in Coeur d’Alene, ID that sells canned beverages through Amazon and Walmart, correct?

47
submitted 3 days ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/usa@midwest.social

“The $1 million recipients are not chosen by chance,” Gober said Monday. “We know exactly who will be announced as the $1 million recipient today and tomorrow.”

Chris Young, the director and treasurer of America PAC, testified that the recipients are vetted ahead of time, to “feel out their personality, (and) make sure they were someone whose values aligned” with the group.

“This was all a political marketing masquerading as a lottery,” Krasner testified Monday. “That’s what it is. A grift.”

[-] Five@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago

Your comment in another thread made me think you still wanted engagement on this comment. I value good faith discussion, and while we may disagree on what that means, I think you're engaging here in good faith. I value a diversity of thought, and while the conflict in YBTP is clearly a counter-example, we haven't been banning and don't typically ban people from the community who want to discuss anarchist politics with us.

The way I think about elections is foreign to a lot of people, and actually may not be that common among anarchists. I'd like to work on a metaphor to better explain it to people. Would you consider helping me by sharing a dialogue about it?

[-] Five@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

You used to be mozz@mbin.grits.dev, right? Ponder.cat's stylesheet looks nice. How does Lemmy compare to MBin from an admin perspective?

[-] Five@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

SLRPNK is an intentionally both an international instance, as well as an ideologically diverse instance. We give a lot of autonomy to moderators. Despite being administered by anarchists and having a significant membership that identifies as anarchist, we expect our anti-fascist moderators to follow the politics of their conscience rather than toe a particular anarchist line. Solarpunk is an internationalist movement, and should not be dominated by any one country or culture.

These two goals sometimes create tension. A significant portion of our international audience is from the United States, and some SLRPNK moderators have filled their community feeds with Democratic Party propaganda. I guarantee @mambabasa does not want Trump to win, and criticizing the hypocrisy of liberal politicians and the losing proposition of elevating electoral politics above direct action is not an endorsement of fascism.

Mambabasa’s posting history at the time I looked at it started with:

His meme posts exist in the context of a local feed full of United States election centered news in what is supposed to be a haven for internationalists and anarchists. They're a reminder that anarchists are not edgy Democrats, and if that idea is offensive, you can unsubscribe and block !anarchism and !notvoting@slrpnk.net. Other people existing who don't share your politics and have their own spaces should not be so threatening to someone with confidence in their own ideology.

91
submitted 1 week ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/memes@slrpnk.net
26
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Five@slrpnk.net to c/music@slrpnk.net
196
13
submitted 1 week ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/environment@beehaw.org
view more: next ›

Five

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF