979
submitted 3 months ago by meldrik@lemmy.wtf to c/facepalm@lemmy.wtf
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago

It should honestly be a disqualifying demonstration of bad decision making.

You can either put in a lot of effort straight away (saving time and effort later), or delay the inevitable, pay quite a large sum in transport costs every day, and have to do infinite airport runs?...

Choosing the latter shows he shouldn't have the job.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

But he make number go up! Him good CEO! Ugh guh. EBITDA unk chick-ken

[-] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago

Honestly it shows a lack of commitment. By refusing to relocate it shows he’s not planning on staying.

Come in, axe some heads, “streamline” and “cost cut” whilst gutting indispensable roles that have invisible contribution. Stock gets attention, lines goes up, he gets his bonus payout; it’s a classic CEO shuffle pump and dump.

Or maybe he’s their agreed scapegoat for their increasing union busting. Either way, he clearly has no plans to stay with the company long term.

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
979 points (99.0% liked)

Facepalm

186 readers
1 users here now

Anything that makes you apply your hand to your face.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS