312
WHO THE FUCK
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
312 points (95.3% liked)
memes
10305 readers
1844 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I remember playing Fallout 3 for the first time and getting to the end with Fawkes as my companion, and getting extremely pissed that he refused going into project purity, no one needed to be sacrificed, he could simply turn it on with zero issues to himself, he knew that, he even offered to go into heavy radiation before to spare the player the extreme radiation.
But nope, at the end suddenly the player needed to die, the player who helped set him free.
Yeah, thanks for that...
Never understood why the player was shunned.
Apparently, a game-breaking glitch would occur if he did. Bethesda, in it's infinite wisdom, wrote dialogue to make him refuse rather than fix the glitch.
I found no source for that claim, and Fawkes(and two other companion) will do it in Broken Steel.
I had a really similar experience playing cyberpunk weirdly. Like, you think you're being clever by doing something that logically should save you based on the established rules of the world, then the writers decide to pull the rug out right at the end and say "nope, sorry we've got a thematic ending in mind and you have to die no matter what". Really left a sour taste in my mouth.
This is what really upset me about the ending of Emily Is Away.
Emily throughout the game asks me why I did things I, the player, did not agree to do (I agree to go to a party with Emily and in the next chapter she's asking me why I hooked up with her??), and at the very end they really hammer home how much your relationship with Emily has deteriorated by letting you pick a dialog option asking about your future together, and then making you watch your character type it out, delete it, and ask her about the weather instead.
Taking away player agency is bad enough, but trying to make an emotional moment centered around it? Fuck off.
I un-licenced the Emily games from my steam library. The writing felt... arrogant? Like, it didn't matter what you chose you were wrong.
I know what consent is, I don't need a videogame to do things without mine and then rub it in my face.
There are endings in cyberpunk where V survives.
In the original game? I played before the DLC
Yep, there are two endings I know of for sure where V survives. I believe they added another V survives ending after the Phantom Liberty DLC. They all might not be the happiest of endings but V lives.
Didn't
Spoiler
Some DLC or update allowed certain companions to turn the project purity on for you?Happy Cakeday! ๐ฐ๐
Nope, they didn't change that with Broken Steel
Fallout wikia says
Allright, it was a while since I played it, sorry about that!