117
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] stuner@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

Raindrop energy harvesting is a rubbish idea. The raindrops simply don't have a meaningful amount of energy to begin with: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36907674

[-] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 11 points 2 months ago

Yeah but a journalism student just learned the phrase "triple threat" and wanted to shoehorn it into an article

I'm sure his mum pinned it on the fridge

[-] cmhe@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Yeah, the whole article is a bit fishy:

In addition to generating clean electricity, the new ITO-silver window coating creates a cooling effect by allowing only the visible part of the light spectrum to pass inside. Other parts of the spectrum are reflected outside.

So how would a room actively cool down, when you let only the visible light spectrum inside? Sure it might not get as hot as if you let all light inside, but it will also not get colder.

[-] sploosh@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

They subscribe to the theory that less forward acceleration is the same thing as slowing down.

[-] daddyjones@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Honestly, if this was all it did I'd want it. Our house is south facing and the front of the house gets very hot in summer. Windows that effectively limited the amount of heat that could come through would help a lot - even if, as you say, it doesn't actively cool

[-] hikaru755@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

That kind of window has been around for a long time already. Also, let me introduce you to window awnings

[-] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago

I mean, not in the sense that they're trying to do it, but that's ultimately what drives hydroelectric dams.

[-] stuner@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Sure, but those are completely different approaches. Dams have the advantage that they have a much larger capture area for water and that they can accelerate the water beyond the 10 m/s terminal velocity of raindrops.

[-] Zwiebel@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago

We gotta build a reservoir just below cloud level and then put turbines all the way down to sea level to harvest more of the energy

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Blimp reservoirs!

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 2 months ago

not if your getting it anyway. if the cost is worthwhile for the cooling and defrost qualities anyway and you get some energy for free then even a little is fine. Its like the old prius that had solar panels to help with ac but it would not power the car.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

if the cost is worthwhile

lol

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 2 months ago

Could be significant. The main reason I have to put on heat is to defrost and the rear window defrost is pants. then passive summer cooling could reduce ac quite a bit.

this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
117 points (92.1% liked)

Technology

59205 readers
3013 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS