185
submitted 4 months ago by Aatube@kbin.melroy.org to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

plus the usual betterfox

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago

You could use this opportunity to educate on why instead of trying to make people feel bad

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 29 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Alright, sure.

GitHub is owned by Microsoft. Microsoft has a long history of opposing open-source, like its founder rallying against it before the term even existed, or its former CEO calling it a cancer.

Microsoft is also quite prominently known for a strategy of embracing open standards they don't like, to kill them off. Particularly, they might be looking to extend and displace Git.

Microsoft also violates the licenses of the open-source projects on GitHub.
As someone publishing open-source software, I do not put the license for fun in there. If I know for a fact that it's being violated, I will not publish my code. For the same reasons, I also don't contribute to projects on GitHub.

And last but not least, Microsoft also has a history of violating privacy laws.
Particularly, if your project advertises itself as privacy-centric, like this browser does, then this excludes your users from reporting bugs, discussing the direction of the project or contributing.

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2024
185 points (97.0% liked)

Open Source

31724 readers
138 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS