233
Paying for software is stupid… 10 free and open-source SaaS replacements (www.youtube.com)
submitted 3 months ago by pnutzh4x0r@lemmy.ndlug.org to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
63 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Remember, for every paid SaaS, there is a free open-source self-hosted alternative. Let's take a look at 10 FOSS tools designed to replace popular tools like MS Office, Notion, Heroku, Vercel, Zoom, Adobe, and more.

...

⭐ Repos mentioned

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Engywuck@lemm.ee 77 points 3 months ago

Paying for software is not inherently stupid. Bad and misleading title.

[-] figjam@midwest.social 14 points 3 months ago

Agreed, you are paying for it to be someone else's problem to fix.

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago

I support them adding ads and commercials into their products like pop ups and stuff or they can sell my information

[-] nonagonOrc@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's just clickbait, which is unavoidable on youtube if you want your video to be seen by more than 5 people. I don't blame the creator for it tbh, especially because this title is not really misleading, just an opinion.

[-] Engywuck@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

One if the reasons why I avoid YouTube completely.

[-] Stitch0815@feddit.org 1 points 3 months ago

I agree. Now I'll go back to watching youtube videos on my payed Grayjay.

[-] Engywuck@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

What's Grayjay?

[-] Stitch0815@feddit.org 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

An alternative video client. Mostly known for pulling add free youtube. But you can have several sources like patreon or nebula. The app is free and source available but they ask you to buy a license if you like it. It's made/supportes by futo

Edit: changed "open source" to "source available"

[-] Engywuck@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Thanks

[-] chebra@mstdn.io 0 points 3 months ago

@Stitch0815 @Engywuck

> Grayjay Core License 1.0

nope, that's not open-source

[-] Stitch0815@feddit.org 1 points 3 months ago

Ah thanks A bit more context would have been nice but anyway

I was not aware of the distinction.

Grayjay is source available. But you are essentially not allowed to do anything with/to it.

[-] logging_strict@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Not triggered by this emotional outrage bait

it either costs your time or money or both. There is no situation where anything is free.

I'm currently fixing, not mine, repos. I have the skill level to fix other coders design issues. One at a time.

This is costing me time. Not just in doing the work, but all the time leading up to gaining the skillset to be at this level.

Put a price tag on that. (i'm not boasting; actually having to do this grind)

this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
233 points (84.0% liked)

Open Source

31724 readers
110 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Cloak@lemmy.ml
kevincox@lemmy.ml
CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml