491
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world

Amazon trying to cover their ass?

Updated Wednesday, September 4, 2024 5:10 p.m. EST - Amazon reached out to deny the reports of a crack down on singing along with the radio in trucks and provided this PR video clip as evidence. A PR spokesperson told Jalopnik: “This post is completely inaccurate. Amazon has never issued guidance or communications to Delivery Service Partners that prohibits singing in the vehicle.”

https://youtu.be/3ddtY_iOrk8

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 78 points 2 weeks ago

The real question is... why the fuck should anyone be micromanaged to this fucking extent. It's probably hurting actual productivity... even if their broken ass metrics are showing an improvement.

It fucking sucks to be deprived of the joy in what you do - there isn't much joy in delivery to begin with but vibing to the music while driving down an empty stretch of road is one of the little ones... the more you suck the joy out of a job the less shits your employees will give.

[-] eramseth@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

Heard about this a while back. I think the real explanation is that amazon wants cameras in their vehicles to monitor their drivers. But Amazon's insurer says "if you have this video we want to see it, and if your drivers are distracted in general, your insurance rates are going up" and/or when there's an incident, any evidence of distracted driving will be leveraged against amazon... so instead of getting rid of the cameras, they are micromanaging their employees not to be distracted while driving, where "distracted" includes talking on the phone and also singing or speaking.

It's all really shitty tbh.

I get that with a company as big as Amazon, small margins can make a big difference, but... pretty sure that's just an argument against giant fucking companies running everything...

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago

maybe it's because the more time wage slaves are thinking about not being allowed to sing, the less time they're thinking about how shitty the pay is

[-] TommySoda@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago

Even slaves were allowed to sing.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I had a job where my boss got angry at me for playing music in my office with the door closed, because I was wasting bandwidth. On my ipod. So I used headphones.

[-] rednalsi 2 points 1 week ago
[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Now I want to see a black Amazon driver dressed as a slave, singing "Swing Low Sweet Chariot", and getting chewed out over an in-van loudspeaker.

"Yuhsir! Won't happen again suh!"

Can you imagine the emergency PR meetings?!

[-] TheFriar@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

I feel like the more workers are generally miserable, the more they’ll be disgruntled

this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
491 points (97.7% liked)

Work Reform

9818 readers
128 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS