15
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
15 points (94.1% liked)
DM Academy
2 readers
1 users here now
A community for discussion, questions, tools, or advice regarding being a Dungeon Master (or Game Master) for Dungeons and Dragons or RPG's in general
/c/DnD Network Communities
- Dungeons and Dragons
- Dungeons and Dragons - Art
- Dungeons and Dragons - Homebrew
- Dungeons and Dragons - Memes and Comics
- Dungeons and Dragons - AI
- Dungeons and Dragons - Looking for Group
Rules (Subject to Change)
- Be a Decent Human Being
- There are 4 types of posts here, Questions, Advice, Articles, and Tools; Stories belong in !dnd@lemmy.world
- DO NOT Downvote simple or beginner questions, this is a space for EVERYONE from beginners to advanced DMs
- No Piracy, this includes links to torrent sites, hosted content, streaming content, etc. Please see this post for details
- Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.
- No NSFW content
- Abide by the rules of lemmy.world
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The switchboard model is going to make it a lot worse than telepathy. Consider the action flow:
Switch at any point may need a message repeated costing another action for the sender, and is more likely to need a repeat when messages are sent in stressful situations.
If Switch has other duties, the party might need to arrange ahead of time that they are going to need the service. The service also lacks efficient broadcast capabilities. Each stone needs to be activated sequentially, and Switch can reasonably only be expected to understand one person talking at once.
I think it sits closer to telegraph than a moble phone. Depending on the kind of campaign it might represent a vulnerability that can be exploited.
Perfect. Let the players run with it. The more impractical and overcomplicated it is the more opportunities for the DM to set up unintended consequences.