553
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Buttons@programming.dev 294 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ads will always be detectable because you cannot speed up or skip an ad like you can the rest of the video.

If they do make it so you can speed up or skip the ad sections of a video, mission accomplished.

If all else fails, I'd enjoy a plugin that just blanks the video and mutes the sound whenever an ad is playing. I'll enjoy the few seconds of quiet, and hopefully I can use that time to break out of the mentally unhealthy doom spiral that is the typical YouTube experience.

[-] Hrothgar59@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

My brain just does that anyway, after decades of ads I just tune them out. And at home I use ad blockers.

[-] vvvvv@lemmy.world 61 points 1 month ago

That's not how it works. Or, rather, that's not only how it works. Sure, advertisers dream of users who see an ad once and run to buy a product. But ad effects are spread over time. They build brand recognition. They fake familiarity. Say you are in a supermarket and you want to buy a new type of product that you haven't bought before. Very likely you'll pick something familiar-sounding, which you heard in an ad. Ads pollute the mind even if the most obvious effects are, well, obvious and easily discarded, more subtle influence remains.

[-] thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev 18 points 1 month ago

If it makes you feel any better, I intentionally never use products that have intentionally repetitive messaging or earworm tendencies out of spite. Though I know I'm probably in the minority

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago

Do we unintentionally use products we didn’t realize repetitively messaged us?

We’ll never know…

Just kidding, we can be sure it’s incredibly well studied given the billions and billions of dollars going into ads!

[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Totally no bias in these studies at all either, they totally wouldn't try to skew these studies for personal gain and to try and justify the huge spending on ad money right?

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

You can fool some of the people some of the time… right? :)

I’d expect nothing less than executives at a number of the Fortune 50 to be ruthlessly cutthroat, including when it comes to vetting the claims of their marketing teams.

(I know I’m speaking about studies I only assume to exist by the way, will have to research it later)

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

surely large corpos would waste billions on ads if they didn't see any financial return right!

Also, we should be taking a page from the propaganda playbook right now, that should pretty much tell us all we need to know lol.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
553 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
3943 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS