102
submitted 3 months ago by Bunny19@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

so a common claim I see made is that arch is up to date than Debian but harder to maintain and easier to break. Is there a good sort of middle ground distro between the reliability of Debian and the up-to-date packages of arch?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

but then why use OpenSUSE instead of just Fedora?

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago

Because they have Slowroll and working, automatic BTRFS snapshots.

I have no idea what dnf Fedora is doing, using BTRFS but no snapshots.

[-] EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I think fedora does have some automatic snapshots, just not as much as OpenSUSE. Still tho, why not setup better snapshots on Fedora rather than switch package manager and repos altogether on openSUSE?

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 months ago

No they dont. Just the basic kernel backups, which is pretty little

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
102 points (97.2% liked)

Linux

48762 readers
944 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS