Oh yes, and if that is how you interpreted what I said, then thank you for taking it in stride and responding in a good-natured way. But if you go back and re-read it... I feel like what I said had a lot more to do with him than you pointing that out about him:-).

i.e., he is pretentious, claiming to "know" things, but (seemingly?) lacking in the area of humility, or even just precision, which is to know and express clearly where one's own knowledge ends and instead one's lack of knowledge begins.

And that is exactly what Tyson has built up his career around trying to tell people! e.g. "you don't know shit!" (while ignoring the limitations of his own sphere of knowledge)

In point of fact though, YOU know where your knowledge ends, i.e. have humility, thus it is quite obvious that you are nothing at all like Tyson:-P. 😅

I suppose what I am saying - and I may not express myself clearly here but I will try:-D - is that Tyson is correct: for people in a LEADERSHIP role (like scientists & educators), rather than blurt out whatever thoughts first come to our mind, we would do well to think it through and stfu with our interjections of things that go beyond the plain and simple facts. The weird part is, he made his career out of doing precisely the opposite of that! He blurts out his own thoughts about their thoughts, and people loved that "drama" so he just never stops.

He is a victim of his own success in a way, except as you say, he is the one who stepped up into that role, not you or I.