94
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sc_griffith@awful.systems 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

there's a similarity in the sense that they're both 'content free.' pagerank didn't care about what was on your site, only what your page linked to and what pages linked to you

(past tense bc it's unclear to me whether Google even uses pagerank at this point)

they diverge pretty significantly in one way: pagerank is an algorithm motivated by pragmatic simplifications. discarding the information of content when ranking sites is only something you would do because using content is really hard. you can take the statistical approach to semantics in the same spirit, but you don't have to... ai true believers are necessarily treating the maxim I referred to as a philosophical claim, something that addresses the ground truth of what words are

[-] o7___o7@awful.systems 8 points 1 month ago

ai true believers are necessarily treating the maxim I referred to as a philosophical claim, something that addresses the ground truth of what words are

Thanks for breaking it down, I was missing this key bit!

this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
94 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1401 readers
205 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS