Archived version: https://archive.ph/pnSkK
Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20230811190927/https://www.techdirt.com/2023/08/11/appeals-court-says-a-cop-can-violate-another-cops-rights-by-squints-at-ruling-shooting-at-the-other-cop/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Landrin201@lemmy.ml 62 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And it was the cop whose rights were violated, not the guy who they were shooting at for no reason.

[–] exohuman@programming.dev 36 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, they just gave that guy an attempted murder charge he has to fight off.

[–] MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

AND they fired the cop who was shot because she apparently forgot to turn on her body cam before going in. The shooting cop experienced no professional repercussions, but the other two people involved did. It’s really special.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nepotism. It's always nepotism. He'll turn out to have a link to higher ups, they always do.

[–] MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

Nepotism is not required for police union nonsense. He’s just the white guy in the situation, probably