10
Should I create functions/methods for packages/libraries that allow optional parameters to accept null as a value? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 month ago by trymeout@lemmy.world to c/javascript@programming.dev
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Should I create functions/methods for packages/libraries that allow optional parameters to accept null?

In this example below, I set the 3rd and 4th parameter as null which will act as the default value.

myLibrary.myFunction(1, 7, null, null, true);

Or is this not a good way to go about creating functions for a package and therefore should not accept null as a parameter value.

myLibrary.myFunction(1, 7, false, 4, true);
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

When null can be handled rationally, a library should accept it and do something reasonable.

When null makes no sense whatsoever, a library should error out if it receives null.

So it's up to your use case which is most appropriate.

The core principle is the program should stop executing the moment we 100% know that we're not going to accomplish what the user needs. In many cases, being passed 'null' tells us that.

In any other case, the program should pick a reasonable (default) option for the user and continue running.

this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
10 points (100.0% liked)

JavaScript

1700 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
erlingur@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
nick@programming.dev