71
submitted 3 weeks ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] momocchi@lemmy.world 50 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah because Chris Roberts is so well known for reliable release dates

[-] felykiosa@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 weeks ago

They played it live wasn't perfect but a 2026 release is completely plausible

[-] momocchi@lemmy.world 31 points 3 weeks ago

I’m sure its plausible, but I just have no faith left in them to stick to a date so would not be at all surprised to see it slip

[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Genuinely though, they're right I'm surprised it's not a 2025 release date.

2026 is plenty of time to finish an animation-heavy linear "CoD/Battlefield in space" campaign that is supposed to be feature complete and playable already.

Squadron 42 is nothing like Star Citizen. It's about as impressive as a 2004 Morrowind-lookalike single-player Elwynn Forest to Deadmines to Onyxia campaign with a preset character running around in a modified World of Warcraft engine, while the devs are struggling and failing to make 40 player raids and Alterac Valley possible.

I'm not particularly interested in Chris Robert's toy space opera, using SC's fantastic assets to make a silly Top Gun space parody while SC fails to realize its actually interesting goals, like large scale combined arms "star wars" warfare in a completely open space and planetside theater where boarding capital ships is possible.

I don't see them stabilizing SC ever, it seems like it'll never be playable by anyone without an incredible patience for bullshit and faff. I'm just $90 deep but I'll be very happy if I'm wrong and my Arrow gets to see their grandiose galaxy.

But SQ42? Sure. 2026 makes sense.

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 3 weeks ago

Man, you young folks must not have been around for E3, or all the various leaked E3 presentation builds of games over the years.

You can pull off some amazing looking stuff with just scripting the hell out of everything and only showing what you want people to see. Toss in some obviously unfinished stuff to make it all look more legit.

Gameplay "demos" that are not open to the public to mess with are just ad reel by another name.

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Did those games you’re talking about take gamers money first, and then subsequently failed to release much of anything for the next thirteen years?

Kinda sorta not the same at all.

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 10 points 3 weeks ago

I heard the same bullshit about a 2016 release of SC. It's nothing but copium. It's laughably easy to show "gameplay" of a prepared show demo, even if nothing of the actual game actually existed. Roberts has done this so many times already.

[-] Fades@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago

wasn’t perfect

The “feature complete” ~~game~~ tech demo crashed

https://m.youtube.com/live/m3eHBhHsrm4?si=W0VjpxSoLALspDzk&t=8h0m50s

this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
71 points (91.8% liked)

PC Gaming

8568 readers
328 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS