821

I guess he thinks he's one upping Harris or something? Weird.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Squorlple@lemmy.world 73 points 2 months ago

Did McDonald’s corporate agree to this political stunt? Or was it just one specific location that agreed for him to come in?

[-] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 96 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

One specific franchise location and they were closed to customers during the visit with the staged customers all vetted by USSS and having gone through a rehearsal ahead of time to practice what they were going to do.

[-] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 83 points 2 months ago

Someone else I just read compared this to a make-a-wish® activity.

[-] teft@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago

More like that time Michael Jackson paid to have a grocery store shut down for the day and filled with his friends and family as customers just so he could feel what it's like to be a normal person.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Did he have some kind of people phobia? Why not just go to a grocery store?

I already know your going to say "but it's MJ!?!" but honestly if he wore a baja jacket and some sweat pants with some tennis shoes or some beat up shower flat sandals. Everyone would just assumed he was another weirdo and advert their eyes. Then he would get the true shopping experience haha

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 20 points 2 months ago

A regular place would have soon been swarming with crazy fans had MJ showed up even unannounced.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

Not if he pulled up in like a Subaru and did like 15 to 20 minutes of shopping. By the time they realized who he was and started dialing their friends on their flip phones he could be out the door with his frozen pizza, dunkaroos and mango juice.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 17 points 2 months ago

I mean he wanted to experience shopping, not dart in for a quick grab of things for the night. You also underestimate how word would spread even back then.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

People would have recognized him. Plus he wanted to peruse the aisles and check things out, not hide away. He wouldn't have known how to dart in and out, that was the point.

Also people didn't have cell phones in the 80s (I think that's when he did it). Would have been a payphone.

[-] IMongoose@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

He was a star since childhood, he probably had no idea how to act like a normal person.

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 months ago

trump is dying, and it was his last wish to see where the hamberders come from.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago
[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 1 points 2 months ago

I hope not. He has criminal cases to answer.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

I wonder how corporate feels about this.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

"I wonder why the check from donald is late?"

this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
821 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2263 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS