18
submitted 1 day ago by troyunrau@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

I'm strongly pro-nuclear from an environmental perspective. But NIMBYism always stalls it. There's a fallback location near Thunder Bay, but I'd wager a shiny nickel that it gets ruled out after aboriginal consultation.

For some of these projects, the government really just to move forward by dictat, in my opinion. At some point you buy a dying mining town just for this purpose or something.

[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Ok. Then put the nuclear waste facility somewhere in the Golden Horseshoe, closer to the millions of customers who will use most of the power.

[-] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

If the geology was appropriate, I wouldn't be opposed.

[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

You would likely be opposed by millions of others tho.

Nobody wants a nuclear waste facility in their backyard, especially those who live in the heart of the Canadian Shield where the rock fissures that feed ground water wells can travel hundreds of kms in any direction ... meaning that the smallest of leakages can do the same.

[-] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

That's just junk science. Groundwater flow rates are easy to measure. And any such facility will be both over engineered and one of the best monitored locations on the planet.

I mean, aside from choosing a location specifically because the rock lacks fractures, isn't stressed, not earthquake prone, etc...

Whatever. I guess we kill the planet instead of getting the needle.

[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

It's not junk science. The shield is a deranged drainage system, meaning that there is "no coherent pattern to the rivers and lakes" (source). The fissues in the mafic rock (aka greenstone rock), which are surrounded by granite, mean that water flows hapazardly through the underground cracks and caverns (created by glacial erosion and the subsequent post-glacial rebound) to settle in the lowest areas (source).

[-] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Appeal to authority argument incoming. Points to self. Am scientist. Am geoscientist. Am hard rock geoscientist who professionally uses instruments to quantify rock properties.

You're quoting things that do not apply uniformly across the shield as though they apply across the shield. Nuclear waste storage locations ideally are within granite plutons, of which there are many within the shield. You don't think the people looking to develop storage facilities don't look for the most competent rocks? There was a research facility in Pinawa Manitoba for years -- they mapped every fracture in that rock from above and below. They learned construction techniques tailored for the rock. It's goddamned perfect.

Furthermore, have you ever heard of grout? How do you think hydroelectric reservoirs retain their water when built in the shield? Engineering and materials science are marvelous things.

[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 23 hours ago

Then please accept my apologies.

[-] streetfestival@lemmy.ca 1 points 22 hours ago

I tip my cap to you both in your quality dialogue and mutual respect - a fine Fediverse moment

this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
18 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7169 readers
313 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Regions


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS