614

A satellite belonging to multinational service provider Intelsat mysteriously broke up in geostationary orbit over the weekend.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 46 points 3 weeks ago

Great, more bits of dangerous junk in orbit. The fuckers should have to clear up their mess before it fucks up other satellites.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 25 points 3 weeks ago

This is actually a real problem more so in this case than most. There's an awful lot of satellites in low Earth orbit, altitude of a few hundred to several hundred kilometers. Atmospheric drag still exists here a little bit, and thus space junk will reenter and burn up in years or decades.

This satellite was in geostationary orbit, at an altitude of about 36,000 km. Debris up there can take hundreds of years to come down. Geostationary is a special altitude where the satellite orbits at exactly the same rate as the Earth spins. That means that a fixed dish on Earth will always point at the satellite without needing to move or track. So there's just one narrow orbital ring around the equator for that. That ring is not a place we want space junk to be, because if it gets too hazardous for satellites in GEO that basically removes our capability as a species to use fixed satellite dishes for anything. And that problem won't go away for centuries.

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

How did it break up? I wasn't aware that Boeing was determined to be a fault in the build process.

[-] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah fair point. Boeing has a degraded reputation these days but at the mo we don't know why it broke up. Probably never will. I'm kinda going on Occam's razor here.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

Occam’s razor

We should have captured that thing when he dropped it. It’s just going to keep causing trouble up there.

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago

Previous comment

Circunstancial evidence points to Boeing being a failed company.

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I didn't argue if they were a failed company. Been that way a long time IMO.

this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
614 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
3910 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS