166

What would get you "back to the office"? (midwest.social)

submitted 1 year ago by MNByChoice@midwest.social to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

251 comments fedilink hide all child comments

There are a lot of news articles about "back to the office", but they recirculate the same bad ideas. Let's provide some new ideas for the media to circulate. It may also have the effect of making the office less terrible.

I would like my work computer to do Windows updates lightning quick in the office. It currently takes weeks, in or out of the office. Stopping in for a day makes no difference, so there is no point. Now, if there was a point, I would go in.

What would get you in the office?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] riseuppikmin@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Some things that would make me consider it:

Free high quality lunches every day
Transportation compensation in the form of both work time (if the office is poorly located) and monetary compensation for transportation expenses
Management improvement plan with actions they're taking/implementing to reduce the time they're wasting of laborers on a day-to-day basis
Alteration of the company structure to force a large percentage (simple majority) of ownership to workers to push back against reactionary and profit-driven anti-labor whims of shareholders
Services/compensation that complete tasks that previously I could do during downtime at home
Yearly inflation-pegged CoL raises that apply to every laborer in the company before salary raises are made
Massive investment in in-office employee training programs in the form of role-based training that is chosen by laborers in that particular role/function

If every single one of these things were implemented I would then still probably leave the place for another WFH job if we didn't use our new ownership powers to revert back to WFH immediately.

[-] dom@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Youd give up ownership of the company and extremely employee focused culture, guaranteed favourable yearly increases, as well as the company paying for you to get personal stuff done professionally in order to stay working from home?

This sounds incredibly reactionary and illogical.

[-] riseuppikmin@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I say at the end that we'd probably immediately use those powers to revert back to better working conditions (WFH).

I can't see any scenario where this doesn't happen immediately and was mostly just riffing at the absurdity of thinking companies would implement these things (outside of maybe free lunches) in order to empower labor (to the company's shareholders' detriment) willingly.

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023

166 points (80.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43811 readers

870 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS